| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
05-14-2013, 07:47 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I think the odds that it wasn't partisan aren't bad. -spence
|
According to the Inspector General report, "IRS’s scrutiny went beyond keywords to target ideology.”
So according to the inspector general (who probably knows almost as much about this as you do), ideology was the basis for IRS targeting. The Denver Post ran that on their front page.
Still think there's good odds that it wasn't political?
There's no evidence that Obama had anything to do with this. But any child knows it was political.
Read more: Media can't ignore Obama IRS, Benghazi scandals | Fox News
|
|
|
|
|
05-14-2013, 09:13 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: On my boat
Posts: 9,703
|
Yup
|
LETS GO BRANDON
|
|
|
05-18-2013, 02:39 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
WTH is this, IRS employees have received $92,million in bonuses since 2009 under the new Administration?
Interesting, for what, showing up for work? Since when did Government workers
receive tax payer bonuses, what was the target they had to exceed to get one?
According to one report, 16,900 employees got them including Commissioner
Byrd $60,270 and Lois Lerner, head of tax exempt dept $42,900.
Who in this Administration came up with this idea, why and what were their goals?
|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
05-18-2013, 03:21 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,503
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
So according to the inspector general (who probably knows almost as much about this as you do), ideology was the basis for IRS targeting. The Denver Post ran that on their front page.
Still think there's good odds that it wasn't political?
|
You think they were out to stick it to the Tea Party?
Evidence so far just makes it look like an overburdened group was trying to be efficient. That they were targeting ideology doesn't mean it was political...
-spence
Last edited by spence; 05-18-2013 at 03:26 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2013, 03:49 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
You think they were out to stick it to the Tea Party?
Evidence so far just makes it look like an overburdened group was trying to be efficient. That they were targeting ideology doesn't mean it was political...
-spence
|
"You think they were out to stick it to the Tea Party?"
I think that's established fact at this point...that's what the IRS admitted, and it's why the interim director of the IRS got the axe.
"look like an overburdened group was trying to be efficient. "
They sought efficiency by flagging applications that had the words "tea party" in them. So you're saying the temporry head of the IRS got fired, because his employees were trying to be "efficient". That makes tons of sense.
This is probably the most absurd, dishonest thing you have ever posted. The IRS is admitting the bias, but you still won't admit it.
That's a nice culture of intolerance implemented by Obama. Republicans sit in the back of the bus, punish your enemies, conservatives cling to guns and religion because we are bitter and racist...are these the sentiments you want in a President?
Last edited by Jim in CT; 05-18-2013 at 03:57 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2013, 04:19 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,503
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
"You think they were out to stick it to the Tea Party?"
I think that's established fact at this point...that's what the IRS admitted, and it's why the interim director of the IRS got the axe.
"look like an overburdened group was trying to be efficient. "
They sought efficiency by flagging applications that had the words "tea party" in them. So you're saying the temporry head of the IRS got fired, because his employees were trying to be "efficient". That makes tons of sense.
This is probably the most absurd, dishonest thing you have ever posted. The IRS is admitting the bias, but you still won't admit it.
That's a nice culture of intolerance implemented by Obama. Republicans sit in the back of the bus, punish your enemies, conservatives cling to guns and religion because we are bitter and racist...are these the sentiments you want in a President?
|
The IRS has never admitted their actions were politically motivated. You don't seem to be able to grasp the difference.
-spence
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2013, 05:01 PM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The IRS has never admitted their actions were politically motivated. You don't seem to be able to grasp the difference.
-spence
|
Spence, if the IRS' motives for targeting the Tea Party were not political, please tell me what they were. Is it because the IRS likes the Red Sox, and the Tea Party likes the Yankees? Is that what it was?
Why do you suppose the IRS flagged applications based on the words "tea party", and not on the words "hooray abortion" or "gimme gimme gimme"? Good luck with that...
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2013, 06:27 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,503
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Spence, if the IRS' motives for targeting the Tea Party were not political, please tell me what they were. Is it because the IRS likes the Red Sox, and the Tea Party likes the Yankees? Is that what it was?
Why do you suppose the IRS flagged applications based on the words "tea party", and not on the words "hooray abortion" or "gimme gimme gimme"? Good luck with that...
|
They targeted the Tea Party because it was easy.
-spence
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2013, 06:59 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
The IRS is admitting the bias, but you still won't admit it.
|
JIM, this has to be Spence playing the Devil's Advocate here, it's the only possible explanation. 
|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.
|
| |