Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
Yet they were put in charge as the soul source of protection for a US embassy by this administration .
Your right...pathetic
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
No, the primary protection was from US agents and British contractors who had hired a number of Libyans with an intent I believe to shift security to the government. It looks like there was a desire to keep things smaller in scale as they didn't know how long the mission would last.
The testimony from the House investigation has certainly painted a conflicted view of the situation.
Buck, you did say Hillary lied right? I'd be curious to know if you've found anything to back that up yet...or if you're still looking.
-spence
Hybrid Mode
