Minneapolis teachers contract says white teachers get fired first

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

You made stuff in your 1st sentence

This is explicitly in the contract. Let’s not fire the lousy teachers, let’s fire the honkeys.

Hence you have an integrity problem

2nd the contract was passed by the teachers themselves

3rd it’s called a condition of employment

In my union we approved a contract that if you were seen smoking or using tobacco products you could be terminated

Of course those who got fired tried to say if violated their Rights.

The Courts said you willing negotiated that Right away for a raise

Same thing happened with detailed doctors notes people cried hippa

Courts sorry you negotiated that privacy away

This is no different just faux white outraged . Trying to claim it’s going to throw white better teachers out the door over black teachers who can’t possibly possess the same skills .. tell me I am wrong

Jim even under the old rules seniority would supersede the best teacher if they had no seniority

Didn’t see the Right complaining about that
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

make it really really simple.

you have kids in a school. the school has to lay off a teacher. Would you rather (a) they fire the worst, laziest, least-skilled teacher, or (b) automatically fire the least senior white teacher, even if thatbhaooems to be a terrific teacher?

Have fun answering that.

everybody knows who the worst teachers are. How is it not best for the kids, to get rid of them first?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

make it really really simple.

you have kids in a school. the school has to lay off a teacher. Would you rather (a) they fire the worst, laziest, least-skilled teacher, or (b) automatically fire the least senior white teacher, even if thatbhaooems to be a terrific teacher?

Have fun answering that.

everybody knows who the worst teachers are. How is it not best for the kids, to get rid of them first?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

to funny your article has nothing to do with (a) they fire the worst, laziest, or keeping least-skilled teacher it's still all about seniority until it gets to the bottom of the list

but keep injecting something that doesn't apply

the way its written A white teacher would have the same protections if the majority of teachers we Black .. but again if the contract stated Race which it does not

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

to funny your article has nothing to do with (a) they fire the worst, laziest, or keeping least-skilled teacher it's still all about seniority until it gets to the bottom of the list

but keep injecting something that doesn't apply

the way its written A white teacher would have the same protections if the majority of teachers we Black .. but again if the contract stated Race which it does not

right. the article
doesn’t mention firing the worst teacher, because per the contract, they must fore the white teacher.

I don’t think you understand what’s happening. i’ll
see if i can put it into a pop-up book for you.

it’s not all about seniority. it’s about seniority and race
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I don’t think you understand what’s happening. i’ll
see if i can put it into a pop-up book for you.

i
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

he's wound pretty tight.....