NIH explicitly admits today it funded gain of function research at Wuhan

[wdmso]

the U.S. non-profit that funneled NIH money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was not transparent about the work it was doing. So how would anyone know ! if they never told anyone?
And Republicans are suggesting Faucci lied amazing stretch of the truth

Yet 9 Republicans voted to hold Trump aide Bannon in contempt of Congress out of 214 Republicans how sad the law and order party once again chooses party over country

But you post this nonsense
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

the U.S. non-profit that funneled NIH money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was not transparent about the work it was doing. So how would anyone know ! if they never told anyone?
And Republicans are suggesting Faucci lied amazing stretch of the truth

Yet 9 Republicans voted to hold Trump aide Bannon in contempt of Congress out of 214 Republicans how sad the law and order party once again chooses party over country

But you post this nonsense
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence denied that what they did, was gain of function of research. you’re saying it was gain of function research, but that we had no way of knowing because someone in the chain didn’t fully disclose.

Wayne, Faucci has changed his tune on this disease 100 times. he hasn’t gotten a single thing right. what would it take, for you to decide he’s lost some
credibility.

The NIH funded ( perhaps without their knowledge, but that’s if you take their word for that) gain of function research at Wuhan. We now know that. That’s not nonsense, that’s now factual.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

spence denied.....

[/i][/size]

no way!

[spence]

Originally Posted by wdmso

the U.S. non-profit that funneled NIH money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was not transparent about the work it was doing. So how would anyone know ! if they never told anyone?

That's not true, to get the grant money EcoHealth had to submit a proposal for the research they intended to do. Based on the NIH review it was determined it wasn't necessary for the stricter P3CO protocols as they weren't going to do anything to make the viruses more infectious to humans. What they didn't do was report their findings on time per the requirements of the contract.

The problem here is people are referring to Gain of Function like some giant catch all that includes just about any research. It's like how CRT is generic for any discussion about race.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

That's not true, to get the grant money EcoHealth had to submit a proposal for the research they intended to do. Based on the NIH review it was determined it wasn't necessary for the stricter P3CO protocols as they weren't going to do anything to make the viruses more infectious to humans. What they didn't do was report their findings on time per the requirements of the contract.

The problem here is people are referring to Gain of Function like some giant catch all that includes just about any research. It's like how CRT is generic for any discussion about race.

i don’t know exactly what gain of function is, and it’s likely you don’t either. what i do know, is that Faucci flatly denied providing any funding for it. but we did.

obviously, you’re going to say that what we funded, wasn’t gain of function. others will
say it was. i don’t know for sure. i do know that at this point Faucci has flip flopped and been so wrong so often, that he has zero credibility with me. the guy loves seeing himself in tv, loves the attention.

I read that combining viruses to see if you can make them
stronger, falls under the umbrella of gain of function. according to the NIH, that’s what they funded in Wuhan.

don’t worry snowflake, , like every other crisis manufactured by the Trumplicans, there’s nothing to see here. As you said, the polls show. idea is doing well. Right?

you’re an expert on finance and virology. that’s very impressive. you know more than rand paul. i don’t think you’ve ever asked a question here, because you know it all. it’s just so impressive.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i don’t know exactly what gain of function is, and it’s likely you don’t either. what i do know, is that Faucci flatly denied providing any funding for it. but we did.

The test EcoHealth were running were not expected to increase the potentcy of a virus, it was just to study molecular interactions. Google it, many documents online.

obviously, you’re going to say that what we funded, wasn’t gain of function. others will

I think I'd rather trust the scientists at the NIH, NIAID etc... over Tucker Carlson and Rand Paul.

say it was. i don’t know for sure. i do know that at this point Faucci has flip flopped and been so wrong so often, that he has zero credibility with me. the guy loves seeing himself in tv, loves the attention.

What has he flipped on? Mask wearing? Give me a break.

I read that combining viruses to see if you can make them
stronger, falls under the umbrella of gain of function. according to the NIH, that’s what they funded in Wuhan.

That's not what they were doing.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

.


That's not what they were doing.

clearly...because no crazy virus has been unleashed on the world recently

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

clearly...because no crazy virus has been unleashed on the world recently

not from Wuhan at least.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

not from Wuhan at least.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Most remarkable coincidence and biggest conspiracy theory in human history
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

The test EcoHealth were running were not expected to increase the potentcy of a virus, it was just to study molecular interactions. Google it, many documents online.


I think I'd rather trust the scientists at the NIH, NIAID etc... over Tucker Carlson and Rand Paul.


What has he flipped on? Mask wearing? Give me a break.


That's not what they were doing.

"The test EcoHealth were running were not expected to increase the potentcy of a virus, it was just to study molecular interactions. Google it, many documents online"

Yet they did increase the potency of the virus, which is why many other scientists have called what we funded at Wuhan, the epitome of gain-of-function research. I don't know what's generally accepted to be gain-of-function, neither do you. But you'll blindly buy into every scientist whose opinion supports liberalism, and refuse to listen to any scientist whose opinion challenges liberalism. You never, ever do anything else. Not once, not ever. It's kind of boring.


Keep nodding like dutiful livestock at everything that comes from the mouth of the guy who not that long ago said masks would be an hysterical over-reaction, and that we just needed to give them two weeks to bend the curve. How many times does he have to flip-flop or just be wrong, before you'd stop listening to him?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

The test EcoHealth were running were not expected to increase the potentcy of a virus, it was just to study molecular interactions. Google it, many documents online.


I think I'd rather trust the scientists at the NIH, NIAID etc... over Tucker Carlson and Rand Paul.


What has he flipped on? Mask wearing? Give me a break.


That's not what they were doing.

you’re denying that faucci has flipped flopped on this.

he specifically said not to wear masks. are you denying that? you’re saying faucci never suggested not to wear masks? spence, he has spewed every conceivable opinion at some point.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fox...radictions.amp

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you’re denying that faucci has flipped flopped on this.

He said specifically he didn’t want to alarm people into creating a shortage of masks needed by healthcare workers. At the time also the CDC was not recommending people wear masks and the WHO didn’t know the virus was airborne.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

He said specifically he didn’t want to alarm people into creating a shortage of masks needed by healthcare workers. At the time also the CDC was not recommending people wear masks and the WHO didn’t know the virus was airborne.

So, we are told that Trump's "messaging" was the cause of all our Covid deaths. But, we are not supposed to notice the death producing messages of the "experts" like Fauci, WHO, and the CDC (not to mention the other "clowns" like the Dems and the media who parroted the same messaging at that critical early time, and wasn't it also supposed to be Trump's fault because he supposedly didn't act quick enough even though the "experts" were slow to come around on their mask messaging and criticized Trump as being racist for instituting a travel ban at the time then criticized him later for not banning travel even more when they all flip-flopped their opinion later?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

The problem here is people are referring to Gain of Function like some giant catch all that includes just about any research. It's like how CRT is generic for any discussion about race.

and the wuhan virus probably didn't come from the wuhan lab coincidentally experimenting with the wuhan virus.....

it's like how leftist call everything hate and racism now....