Durham’s probe into Russian investigation now a criminal investigation

[ReelinRod]

Originally Posted by PaulS

He was not going to stand for the Pres. trying to get a foreign power to interfere with our election - but you knew that.

He is a hearsay reporter of accusations against the president, accusations of something that happened when he was no longer working in the White House.

It's interesting that Vindman admitted to sharing readouts of the call (which he did listen in on) without telling the committee who those people were, or at least stating if he knew those people possessed clearances at a level to read such a document. When questioned by a Republican about this point of interest, Schiff shut down the questioning and ordered Vindman to not answer the question.

Was the "whistleblower" one of the people Vindman gave a readout to? After quitting the White House in 2017, under suspicion of leaking, did the "whistleblower" possess a top secret clearance?

Originally Posted by PaulS

You're a joke. There is no need for anyone to waste any time on you.

At least I can make my posts readable by having the skills to use the quote tag properly. I don't read anything you write that's longer than a couple sentences, so feel free to ignore me to your heart's delight.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by ReelinRod

At least I can make my posts readable by having the skills to use the quote tag properlyThat really hurts me.. I don't read anything you write that's longer than a couple sentences, so feel free to ignore me to your heart's delight.

Even Ingrahm got called out for her scumminess but you can continue bc it looks like it suits you.

[ReelinRod]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Even Ingrahm got called out for her scumminess but you can continue bc it looks like it suits you.

"Scumminess" is three pages of the loopyleftie posters here wondering in abject, purposeful, self-imposed ignorance about what Durham is investigating . . . And then, when I exactingly lay out plenty of Obama administration illegality that led directly to the Russian collusion hoax and the fake investigation into it, you ignore it.

Scumminess is ignoring facts you asked for and instead running back under your mommy's apron of another safe, mindless false narrative of the left, only peeking out enough to shake your fist and say orange man bad . . .

So pathetic and so predictable, keep parroting what you think is a cudgel until it is destroyed and then turn and shift to another BS cudgel.

Please, you said I wasn't worth your time, prove it.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by ReelinRod

"Scumminess" is three pages of the loopyleftie posters here wondering in abject ignorance about what Durham is investigating . . . t.

No, scumminess is saying these folks are guilty of sedition.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

No, scumminess is saying these folks are guilty of sedition.

you are sounding very cranky...open your mind and try to be civil

[ReelinRod]

Originally Posted by PaulS

No, scumminess is saying these folks are guilty of sedition.

Why recoil from the label?

Isn't sedition the very mission statement of embedded Obama holdovers and members of "The Resistance"?

From holdovers in the White House and the State Department and the "intelligence Community" (and even the federal judiciary), "The Resistance" program has been to frustrate and delay and hobble the Trump "agenda" no matter what your actual job description is, or what your official duties are.

You admit as much, you hold the "whistleblower" in high regard because he was (as a analyst working deep in the bowels of Langly) driven to expose the President. What BS!

Same for Vindman, you say, "He was not going to stand for the Pres. trying to get a foreign power to interfere with our election" . . .

Well, first off, that's a characterization entirely driven by politics completely divorced from the fact that the power to drive foreign policy is exclusively the President's and Vindman's job, and the State Department's job is to implement the President's initiatives and agenda, not their own (or the previous administration's agenda).

Stop acting like you don't get this.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by ReelinRod

Why recoil from the label?

Isn't sedition the very mission statement of embedded Obama holdovers and members of "The Resistance"?

From holdovers in the White House and the State Department and the "intelligence Community" (and even the federal judiciary), "The Resistance" program has been to frustrate and delay and hobble the Trump "agenda" no matter what your actual job description is, or what your official duties are.

You admit as much, you hold the "whistleblower" in high regard because he was (as a analyst working deep in the bowels of Langly) driven to expose the President. What BS!So if the President is doing something illegal and someone comes forward w/that info. that is sedition?

Same for Vindman, you say, "He was not going to stand for the Pres. trying to get a foreign power to interfere with our election" . . .

Well, first off, that's a characterization entirely driven by politics completely divorced from the fact that the power to drive foreign policy is exclusively the President's and Vindman's job, and the State Department's job is to implement the President's initiatives and agenda, not their own (or the previous administration's agenda).Coming forward w/info. on the Pres. trying to get a foreign gov. to interfere w/our elections isn't driving foreign policy.

Stop acting like you don't get this.

I do get it and I think it is scummy to call war heroes guilty of sedition.

[ReelinRod]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I do get it and I think it is scummy to call war heroes guilty of sedition.

While it wouldn't change my opinion of him, I have not heard any reporting that Eric Ciaramella, outed as the "whistleblower" was a war hero . . . My sedition comment was directed to him.

Reading comprehension, it isn't just for conservatives.