| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
05-10-2019, 09:49 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
you assume it was unauthorized or improper surveillance
and it was already investigated and determined to be authorized proper surveillance .. prior to Barr
What the right need conspiracy to keep the base involved
|
I didn't assume that it was unauthorized or improper. Barr, in response to questioning his use of "spying" said that he was concerned with unauthorized or improper surveillance. I think that it is very clear what he meant by "spying."
You're the one who's "assuming" he meant something else.
BTW, I find it telling (not assuming anything) that you're perfectly fine with SCOTUS Judges applying totally different meanings to words in the Constitution than the original meanings of those words when it was written. But in this far, far, far, less important synonymous (not actually different in substance) usage of a word you get all high and mighty about it not being what the supposedly traditional meaning is. |
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2019, 11:42 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,432
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
I didn't assume that it was unauthorized or improper. Barr, in response to questioning his use of "spying" said that he was concerned with unauthorized or improper surveillance. I think that it is very clear what he meant by "spying."
You're the one who's "assuming" he meant something else.
BTW, I find it telling (not assuming anything) that you're perfectly fine with SCOTUS Judges applying totally different meanings to words in the Constitution than the original meanings of those words when it was written. But in this far, far, far, less important synonymous (not actually different in substance) usage of a word you get all high and mighty about it not being what the supposedly traditional meaning is.
|
common sense is hard for you isn't it  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2019, 11:54 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
common sense is hard for you isn't it |
No, it isn't. But nonsense, as you've demonstrated here, comes very easily to you, almost an automatic knee-jerk. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2019, 04:29 PM
|
#4
|
|
Ledge Runner Baits
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,688
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
I didn't assume that it was unauthorized or improper. Barr, in response to questioning his use of "spying" said that he was concerned with unauthorized or improper surveillance. I think that it is very clear what he meant by "spying."
You're the one who's "assuming" he meant something else.
BTW, I find it telling (not assuming anything) that you're perfectly fine with SCOTUS Judges applying totally different meanings to words in the Constitution than the original meanings of those words when it was written. But in this far, far, far, less important synonymous (not actually different in substance) usage of a word you get all high and mighty about it not being what the supposedly traditional meaning is.
|
A Trump supporter believing Barr, that’s shocking, Trumps newly appointed AG ( cough cough personal defense lawyer) it must be so.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2019, 07:39 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Stripers
A Trump supporter believing Barr, that’s shocking, Trumps newly appointed AG ( cough cough personal defense lawyer) it must be so.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I agree. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-11-2019, 07:34 AM
|
#6
|
|
Ledge Runner Baits
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,688
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
I agree, 280 characters from our supreme leader, or statements from his insiders should be accepted as the truth.
|
Fixed it, not sure everyone understands your position.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-11-2019, 08:51 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Stripers
Fixed it, not sure everyone understands your position.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I like it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-15-2019, 04:59 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
dummies desperate for attention....
More than 20 House Democrats will stage a marathon public reading of the entire redacted Mueller report beginning Thursday at noon, and likely ending in the early morning hours of Friday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-15-2019, 08:10 AM
|
#9
|
|
Ledge Runner Baits
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,688
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
dummies desperate for attention....
More than 20 House Democrats will stage a marathon public reading of the entire redacted Mueller report beginning Thursday at noon, and likely ending in the early morning hours of Friday.
|
If it were Hillary and the Congress was held by republicans you would be one of the head cheer leaders on this board. Are you suggesting Congress shouldn’t be allowed to do it’s job? If there is nothing to find why is the executive branch obstruction continuing?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.
|
| |
Hybrid Mode