Barr testimony

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Barr used the word spying to spin and help his boss, pretty clear to most; unless your in the Trump camp. FISA warrants aren’t given out like free samples, Jim I fear you have beaten that Webster dead horse to death.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Would "unauthorized surveillance" or "improper surveillance" be more acceptable words to you? And would it have not helped his boss if he had used those terms rather than "spying"?

Because it was unauthorized or improper surveillance (would that be equivalent to "spying"?) that he was concerned about and that he wanted to investigate.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Would "unauthorized surveillance" or "improper surveillance" be more acceptable words to you? And would it have not helped his boss if he had used those terms rather than "spying"?

Because it was unauthorized or improper surveillance (would that be equivalent to "spying"?) that he was concerned about and that he wanted to investigate.

you assume it was unauthorized or improper surveillance

and it was already investigated and determined to be authorized proper surveillance .. prior to Barr

What the right need conspiracy to keep the base involved

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

you assume it was unauthorized or improper surveillance

and it was already investigated and determined to be authorized proper surveillance .. prior to Barr

What the right need conspiracy to keep the base involved

I didn't assume that it was unauthorized or improper. Barr, in response to questioning his use of "spying" said that he was concerned with unauthorized or improper surveillance. I think that it is very clear what he meant by "spying."

You're the one who's "assuming" he meant something else.

BTW, I find it telling (not assuming anything) that you're perfectly fine with SCOTUS Judges applying totally different meanings to words in the Constitution than the original meanings of those words when it was written. But in this far, far, far, less important synonymous (not actually different in substance) usage of a word you get all high and mighty about it not being what the supposedly traditional meaning is.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

I didn't assume that it was unauthorized or improper. Barr, in response to questioning his use of "spying" said that he was concerned with unauthorized or improper surveillance. I think that it is very clear what he meant by "spying."

You're the one who's "assuming" he meant something else.

BTW, I find it telling (not assuming anything) that you're perfectly fine with SCOTUS Judges applying totally different meanings to words in the Constitution than the original meanings of those words when it was written. But in this far, far, far, less important synonymous (not actually different in substance) usage of a word you get all high and mighty about it not being what the supposedly traditional meaning is.

common sense is hard for you isn't it

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

common sense is hard for you isn't it

No, it isn't. But nonsense, as you've demonstrated here, comes very easily to you, almost an automatic knee-jerk.

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by detbuch

I didn't assume that it was unauthorized or improper. Barr, in response to questioning his use of "spying" said that he was concerned with unauthorized or improper surveillance. I think that it is very clear what he meant by "spying."

You're the one who's "assuming" he meant something else.

BTW, I find it telling (not assuming anything) that you're perfectly fine with SCOTUS Judges applying totally different meanings to words in the Constitution than the original meanings of those words when it was written. But in this far, far, far, less important synonymous (not actually different in substance) usage of a word you get all high and mighty about it not being what the supposedly traditional meaning is.

A Trump supporter believing Barr, that’s shocking, Trumps newly appointed AG ( cough cough personal defense lawyer) it must be so.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

A Trump supporter believing Barr, that’s shocking, Trumps newly appointed AG ( cough cough personal defense lawyer) it must be so.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I agree.

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by detbuch

I agree, 280 characters from our supreme leader, or statements from his insiders should be accepted as the truth.

Fixed it, not sure everyone understands your position.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Fixed it, not sure everyone understands your position.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I like it.