|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
12-09-2018, 08:03 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
I know Getting a blow job is horrible and lying about it is worse
|
The only time it’s horrible is when it’s non consensual. Clinton and Lewinski were both into it...
that whole investigation was a total joke. So what if he denied it...it was no ones business but his and his wife’s. Were any laws broken ?? No.
Trump on the other hand is basically a mafia boss directing a bunch of felons at this point.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-09-2018, 11:54 AM
|
#2
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
The only time it’s horrible is when it’s non consensual. Clinton and Lewinski were both into it...
that whole investigation was a total joke. So what if he denied it...it was no ones business but his and his wife’s. Were any laws broken ?? No.
Trump on the other hand is basically a mafia boss directing a bunch of felons at this point.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Well Fellatrix and Felon both start with F
So they are the same
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
12-09-2018, 11:58 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
The only time it’s horrible is when it’s non consensual. Clinton and Lewinski were both into it...
that whole investigation was a total joke. So what if he denied it...it was no ones business but his and his wife’s. Were any laws broken ?? No.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Consensual but still highly unethical.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-09-2018, 01:35 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Consensual but still highly unethical.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Worthy of impeachment ??? Doubtful.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-09-2018, 03:38 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Consensual but still highly unethical.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
the ability for an intern to give consent to the president, is debatable. so you think teachers should
be able to get involved with students, if the student is above the
minimum age of consent? the difference in authority, doesn’t effect the ability to give consent? i guess you’re not into the whole me too movement then, most were above the age of consent.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-09-2018, 04:21 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
the ability for an intern to give consent to the president, is debatable. so you think teachers should
be able to get involved with students, if the student is above the
minimum age of consent? the difference in authority, doesn’t effect the ability to give consent? i guess you’re not into the whole me too movement then, most were above the age of consent.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I think you’re confusing current CT law with Federal law, and also consider attitudes towards this stuff are a lot different now versus 1995.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-09-2018, 04:34 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
and also consider attitudes towards this stuff are a lot different now versus 1995.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
for some ..... 
|
|
|
|
12-09-2018, 05:06 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I think you’re confusing current CT law with Federal law, and also consider attitudes towards this stuff are a lot different now versus 1995.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
nice dodge. i asked you what you think. don’t want to share? Many states, in addition to CT, make it illegal for students to get involved with teachers.
Again, afraid to tell us what you think?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-09-2018, 05:21 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
nice dodge. i asked you what you think. don’t want to share? Many states, in addition to CT, make it illegal for students to get involved with teachers.
Again, afraid to tell us what you think?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Apples and oranges. With teachers you have the potential for a power imbalance but also for the student to use sex to get preferential treatment. I’m not sure it needs to be illegal if the ages of consent are within range but it’s still unethical and should carry a penalty.
If everyone is an adult the situation is a bit different but certainly carries clear ethics and moral risks.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-09-2018, 05:27 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Apples and oranges. With teachers you have the potential for a power imbalance but also for the student to use sex to get preferential treatment. I’m not sure it needs to be illegal if the ages of consent are within range but it’s still unethical and should carry a penalty.
If everyone is an adult the situation is a bit different but certainly carries clear ethics and moral risks.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
so you’re saying that imbalance cannot exist in a professional relationship between adults. no matter how far apart the difference in position?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-09-2018, 05:44 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Apples and oranges. With teachers you have the potential for a power imbalance but also for the student to use sex to get preferential treatment. I’m not sure it needs to be illegal if the ages of consent are within range but it’s still unethical and should carry a penalty.
If everyone is an adult the situation is a bit different but certainly carries clear ethics and moral risks.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
With Presidents you have the potential for a power imbalance but also for the intern to use sex to get preferential treatment. I’m not sure it needs to be illegal if the ages of consent are within range but it’s still unethical and should carry a penalty.
BTW he wasn't impeached by the house for sexual relations with monica so i don't know why you keep beating the dead horse
|
|
|
|
12-09-2018, 03:37 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
The only time it’s horrible is when it’s non consensual. Clinton and Lewinski were both into it...
that whole investigation was a total joke. So what if he denied it...it was no ones business but his and his wife’s. Were any laws broken ?? No.
Trump on the other hand is basically a mafia boss directing a bunch of felons at this point.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
the law says that when the two parties are from unequal places on the .org chart, that it can’t be consensual. this is why teachers cannot get involved with students, even if the student is 18. in any event, bill didn’t get into trouble for the fling, he got into trouble for
lying about it under oath. you seem to think he got impeached because if the fling - nope. and maybe you don’t care, but i’d say it’s also horrible when the man is married and has children.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-09-2018, 04:34 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
the law says that when the two parties are from unequal places on the .org chart, that it can’t be consensual.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
didn't clinton sign that legislation in to law? 
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.
|
| |