|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
03-21-2018, 07:47 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR
BTW Wayne, I'm all for requiring a safe storage solution (gun safe for example).
It is required in some place and just makes sense.
|
it does make sense...how do you enforce this?
|
|
|
|
03-21-2018, 08:57 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,877
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
it does make sense...how do you enforce this?
|
When a nine year old walks in the bedroom and grabs a handgun and shoots his 13 year old sister in the back of the head you arrest the owner for improper storage. Kind of like the death penalty is supposed to be a deterrent to murder, it might deter a person from leaving the handgun where a child can access it.
|
No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
|
|
|
03-21-2018, 09:02 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,561
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy
When a nine year old walks in the bedroom and grabs a handgun and shoots his 13 year old sister in the back of the head you arrest the owner for improper storage. Kind of like the death penalty is supposed to be a deterrent to murder, it might deter a person from leaving the handgun where a child can access it.
|
The term is called “accessory to murder”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-21-2018, 10:51 AM
|
#4
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,178
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
it does make sense...how do you enforce this?
|
Both of these are after the fact, then laws are broken, arrests made, and charges filed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy
When a nine year old walks in the bedroom and grabs a handgun and shoots his 13 year old sister in the back of the head you arrest the owner for improper storage. Kind of like the death penalty is supposed to be a deterrent to murder, it might deter a person from leaving the handgun where a child can access it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
The term is called “accessory to murder”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
The question is how do you enforce the requirement of someone having to lock up their weapons. Other than random spot-checks by the police (which will never happen), there really isn't a way.
If you want to fix the issue, find a way to fix stupidity and lack of common sense.
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
03-21-2018, 11:09 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,183
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
The question is how do you enforce the requirement of someone having to lock up their weapons. Other than random spot-checks by the police (which will never happen), there really isn't a way.
If you want to fix the issue, find a way to fix stupidity and lack of common sense.
|
No solution is 100% but if it's the law more people will comply simply because they don't want to be held liable. Plenty of options to protect weapons yet keep them available for home defense if needed.
|
|
|
|
03-21-2018, 11:14 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
No solution is 100% but if it's the law more people will comply simply because they don't want to be held liable.
|
you'd think they'd comply because they don't want their kids shooting each other...liability?...good grief
|
|
|
|
03-21-2018, 12:12 PM
|
#7
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,178
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
No solution is 100% but if it's the law more people will comply simply because they don't want to be held liable. Plenty of options to protect weapons yet keep them available for home defense if needed.
|
The question wasn't if it was a sound solution, I don't think anybody here is going to argue that it is smart to lock up guns when there are children around, the question was how do you enforce it?
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
03-22-2018, 03:48 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,134
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
The question wasn't if it was a sound solution, I don't think anybody here is going to argue that it is smart to lock up guns when there are children around, the question was how do you enforce it?
|
How do you enforce a requirement in a state that doesn't have any requirements to own a gun to start with ...
but Mississippi passes strictest abortion law! its madness
|
|
|
|
03-21-2018, 10:18 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy
When a nine year old walks in the bedroom and grabs a handgun and shoots his 13 year old sister in the back of the head you arrest the owner for improper storage.totally agreeKind of like the death penalty is supposed to be a deterrent to murder, it "might"? deter a person from leaving the handgun where a child can access it.
|
that assumes that people who are dumb enough to leave loaded hand guns laying around where little children can access them are going to going to care that there is a law requiring a safe storage solution....
wait...I thought the death penalty is not a deterrent "A 2009 survey of criminologists revealed that over 88% believed the death penalty was NOT a deterrent to murder."
|
|
|
|
03-21-2018, 11:39 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,877
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
that assumes that people who are dumb enough to leave loaded hand guns laying around where little children can access them are going to going to care that there is a law requiring a safe storage solution....
wait...I thought the death penalty is not a deterrent "A 2009 survey of criminologists revealed that over 88% believed the death penalty was NOT a deterrent to murder."
|
Right, that is why I said "supposed to be a deterrent..." Even if it doesn't deter negligent behavior, the owner probably should be held responsible.
|
No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
|
|
|
03-21-2018, 09:05 AM
|
#11
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middleboro MA
Posts: 17,119
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
it does make sense...how do you enforce this?
|
It is only enforceable in the event something happens and then becomes an add on charge like so many other gun laws.
But at least there is a known rule about it and not just relying on common sense since we know that sure is lacking today.
It's pretty sad that in this state it seems like law abiding gun owners have to be paranoid about accidentally having one piece of empty .22 brass shell laying in a crevice somewhere and being in violation of ammo storage laws.
That is a very sad story of those kids, something is terribly wrong today when these things happen, if he used a hammer it would have been just as terrible. Long ago a kid did something similar to a sibling with a hammer after seeing Curly on the Three Stooges getting hit on the head by Moe, you can't think that video games have zero part in this thought process of a child of 9 years old. So the Sheriff is right to question all the facts. I don't see where he said let's blame video games. Just the same as the anti's blaming the NRA and lawful gun owners after a school shooting.
|
The United States Constitution does not exist to grant you rights; those rights are inherent within you. Rather it exists to frame a limited government so that those natural rights can be exercised freely.
1984 was a warning, not a guidebook!
It's time more people spoke up with the truth. Every time we let a leftist lie go uncorrected, the commies get stronger.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.
|
| |