| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
01-06-2016, 06:16 PM
|
#1
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,206
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Perhaps there's a solution here where liability could be factored in. If you have a son with known mental issues, you should be responsible for preventing that person access to your weapons.
|
.....and this executive order fixes that how???
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
|
01-06-2016, 06:25 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
.....and this executive order fixes that how???
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Well, it would start by removing barriers to mental health reporting. The proposed HR 4269 would provide the law to require grandfathered but newly restricted weapons to be locked up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-06-2016, 06:29 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Well, it would start by removing barriers to mental health reporting. The proposed HR 4269 would provide the law to require grandfathered but newly restricted weapons to be locked up.
|
I see the liability being shifted to the doctors .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-06-2016, 06:45 PM
|
#4
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,206
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Well, it would start by removing barriers to mental health reporting. The proposed HR 4269 would provide the law to require grandfathered but newly restricted weapons to be locked up.
|
I thought HR 4269 prohibits the sale of certain weapons.
And whoopie.....a law that requires them to be locked.....but she trusts her kid and still doesn't lock them up.....no effect on crisis at all....but everybody sure feels better
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2016, 06:49 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
I thought HR 4269 prohibits the sale of certain weapons.
And whoopie.....a law that requires them to be locked.....but she trusts her kid and still doesn't lock them up.....no effect on crisis at all....but everybody sure feels better
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
The sale...I don't think it takes anything away.
As for the rest, this is the boring drum you keep beating. It's like if rules aren't perfect they're worthless. Tell that to the auto regulators. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2016, 09:32 PM
|
#6
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,206
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The sale...I don't think it takes anything away.
|
Well didn't you just say it requires people to lock them up???
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2016, 10:04 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
.....and this executive order fixes that how???
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
It does absolutely NOTHING that would have changed what happened in Newtown. Zip. |
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.
|
| |
Hybrid Mode