2 NYPD officers executed in response for Brown and Garner

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by buckman

Funny stuff right there
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

See, Paul can use insulting terms, and it's OK. Must be nice...

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

See, Paul can use insulting terms, and it's OK. Must be nice...

As I said earlier, the majority of your posts are insulting.

You just insulted Spence. You can't help yourself.

[FishermanTim]

"Can't we all just get along?"

[FishermanTim]

Maybe the "an eye for an eye" saying will hold true?

Nah, because in this competative world we live in, there is no such thing as "balance" or "equality" when dealing with anything even remotely related to racial issues. Somehow I see a competative streak amongst our nation's most racially "diverse" cities, and unfortunately the murders will continue to mount (as a means of making their point).

Sad how human nature can be so destructive and degrading?
We can be counted on to sink to our lowest when the opportunity is presented, and we will struggle to rise above it in the end.

Merry Christmas to all, and ....GOD BLESS US EVERY ONE!!!

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

As I said earlier, the majority of your posts are insulting.

You just insulted Spence. You can't help yourself.

So are some of yours. I just wonder what the difference is...

Spence said that both sides fan the flames of racial animosity. True in the literal sense, but no honest person would dispute that the left fans those flames far more than the right (their current narrative is built, in part, on the notion that the plight of blacks isn't due to their own culture which encourages awful decision-making, but rather due to the one percent, whoever that is). To imply otherwise, is dishonest.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

So are some of yours. I just wonder what the difference is...

Spence said that both sides fan the flames of racial animosity. True in the literal sense, but no honest person would dispute that the left fans those flames far more than the right (their current narrative is built, in part, on the notion that the plight of blacks isn't due to their own culture which encourages awful decision-making, but rather due to the one percent, whoever that is). To imply otherwise, is dishonest.

The majority of my posts here are in response to your posts and usually return the venom you spew. I limit them to you rather than paint 1/2 the population with the broad brush you do.

Tell us more about the "plight of blacks" since you seem to know so much about them.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

The majority of my posts here are in response to your posts and usually return the venom you spew. I limit them to you rather than paint 1/2 the population with the broad brush you do.

Tell us more about the "plight of blacks" since you seem to know so much about them.

And the majority of my posts are a direct response to what I perceive as repugnant behavior from your side. So again, please explain the difference. I'm all ears...

The plight of blacks is poverty. Any honest person will admit that the best path to avoid poverty is to make decisions that are shown to avoid poverty - stay in school, study hard, get into a college, pick a majhor that will actually lead to a good-paying job, look presentable, work hard, don't have kids until you are at least 25. Studies show that people who follow this path, black or whote, almost always avoid poverty. Sounds a lot like what the Tea Party (those you called teabaggers) are suggesting.

Your side, Spence's side, takes the opposite approach, despite the fact that we have decades of empirical evidence to show that the liberal solution (here's a few dollars, it's not your fault, it's all whiteys fault, keep voting democrat if you want to keep this welfare) perpetuates poverty, it doesn't solve it.

My side is willing to say what's unpopular, because it;s obviously correct. Your side is willing to cripple an entire culture, in order to secure their votes by getting them addicted to welfare.

try making that wrong.

[Raider Ronnie]

Originally Posted by PaulS

As I said earlier, the majority of your posts are insulting.

You just insulted Spence. You can't help yourself.

What wrong with insulting Spence ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Raider Ronnie

What wrong with insulting Spence ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

When you do it I just assume it's flirting. With Jim it's just a tic.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Raider Ronnie

What wrong with insulting Spence ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Nothing, he usually deserves it.