Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » Political Threads

Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi:

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-01-2014, 11:00 AM   #1
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,368
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe View Post
I think they were called "blue dog democrats" or something like that. ( I haven't had my coffee yet.)
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
That would be incorrect (just finished my coffee - time to build a siege engine):

Quote:
Blue Dog Democrat Philosophy

A Blue Dog Democrat is one who views himself as being in the middle of the partisan spectrum and as an advocate for fiscal restraint at the federal level.

The preamble to the Blue Dog Caucus in the House describes its members as being "dedicated to the financial stability and national security of the country, notwithstanding partisan political positions
The proponents of the southern position prior to Civil War were Democrats. Some (all?) of the northern Democrats backed the Republican position of anti-slavery. The Republican party mainly developed as a response to curb the expansion of slavery north and west of where it existed at the time.

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 11-01-2014, 05:28 PM   #2
rphud
GrandBob
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,561
I think it's "separation of church and state" and "one nation, under God" if memory serves.
rphud is offline  
Old 11-02-2014, 06:33 AM   #3
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by rphud View Post
I think it's "separation of church and state" and "one nation, under God" if memory serves.
is it?...neither of your quotes appears in any or our founding documents nor any of our laws that I'm aware of..."separation of church and state" is described as a "metaphorical description" and a "concept"....and "one nation, under God" was adopted in the early 1950's as part of the Pledge of Allegiance...
scottw is offline  
Old 11-02-2014, 08:48 AM   #4
rphud
GrandBob
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,561
so the long version is

"Separation of church and state" (sometimes "wall of separation between church and state") is a phrase used by Thomas Jefferson and others expressing an understanding of the intent and function of the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The phrase has since been repeatedly used by the Supreme Court of the United States.

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ..." and Article VI specifies that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States." The modern concept of a wholly secular government is sometimes credited to the writings of English philosopher John Locke, but the phrase "separation of church and state" in this context is generally traced to a January 1, 1802 letter by Thomas Jefferson, addressed to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut, and published in a Massachusetts newspaper.

and the documents part is

The Declaration of Independence, the signing of which we commemorate July 4th, alone has five references to God—two in the first paragraph, one in the middle, and two in the last.

“When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

The third reference to God is the word “creator” found in the second paragraph. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” (Creator with the capital "C")

“We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown…”

“And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.”
rphud is offline  
Old 11-02-2014, 09:18 AM   #5
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by rphud View Post
so the long version is

so what you are saying is that none of your 'quotes' are found in any of our founding documents or laws

"Separation of church and state" is a phrase used by "some" to restate what "they" believe, expressing "their" understanding of the intent and function of the Establishment Clause (you need to read what Jefferson actually wrote and why he wrote it)....

God, Creator, Nature's god, Gaia


I'm just pointing out that stating "it's ............" when it's really not, is like stating "........","it's in the Constitution"..when it's really not.....or..."doing God's work" was akin to saying you were working for the people? ....when it's really not
scottw is offline  
Old 11-02-2014, 10:33 AM   #6
rphud
GrandBob
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,561
said quotes can be taken as the common language of the day I suppose.
rphud is offline  
Old 11-02-2014, 12:07 PM   #7
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by rphud View Post
said quotes can be taken as the common language of the day I suppose.
what's wrong with the actual wording in the actual documents?.....it's pretty clear and simple wording.....written so even someone with an 18th century education could understand?

doesn't it seem odd, when discussing the first 10 simple words of our 1st Amendment, to refer to some quote or phrase that no one really knows the origin of ?

Last edited by scottw; 11-02-2014 at 12:42 PM..
scottw is offline  
Old 11-03-2014, 10:31 AM   #8
The Dad Fisherman
Super Moderator
iTrader: (0)
 
The Dad Fisherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR View Post
(just finished my coffee - time to build a siege engine):
We built ours last weekend....

"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
The Dad Fisherman is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com