It's time for us to take more serious action here ...

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by likwid

You apparently can't differentiate between posturing and legitimate threats but I suppose every forum needs a class clown. Thanks for being there for us! I have some bubble wrap for you.

Show for the class the large scale mobilizations of troops NK has done to preempt war on the south.

I hope you have Adobe stock, Photoshop seems to be popular lately.

"You apparently can't differentiate between posturing and legitimate threats"

Maybe ScottW and I can't tell the difference. But it stands to reason that the top US commander in South Korea can tell the difference. Did you read Scott's post? He quoted the top US commander as saying this is not a threat to be ignored.

Likwid, just because someone disagrees with you, that alone doesn't mean they are a right-wing idiot.

No one wants to take any unnecessary steps. But we don't want to get caught with our pants down, either, like we did in Libya in September. Agreed?

[Sea Dangles]

I think Ted gets a kick out of making jokes that are funny to him but loses focus on the issue at hand.To compare our role in this threat to what happened in Pakistan shows the absence of a clue in foreign policy,much like our our president. But the clever joke is his way of distracting the observers.Earth to Likwid;are you there?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

I think Ted gets a kick out of making jokes that are funny to him but loses focus on the issue at hand.To compare our role in this threat to what happened in Pakistan shows the absence of a clue in foreign policy,much like our our president. But the clever joke is his way of distracting the observers.Earth to Likwid;are you there?

"clever" would be an awfully generous scoring by the judges...

[likwid]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Maybe ScottW and I can't tell the difference. But it stands to reason that the top US commander in South Korea can tell the difference. Did you read Scott's post? He quoted the top US commander as saying this is not a threat to be ignored.

There's a very big difference between "taking threats seriously" and the flailing idiot bombing thoughts in this thread.

Smuggling a nuke into S Korea? That would imply N Korea had any form of competence. They can't even keep the electricity on 24/7.

And Dangles, can you even name the head of state of Pakistan? And why he was so upset over us killing OBL?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by likwid

Smuggling a nuke into S Korea? That would imply N Korea had any form of competence. They can't even keep the electricity on 24/7.

Fairly easy. Here is a quick three: Midget sub, mine, fishing boat.

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by likwid

There's a very big difference between "taking threats seriously" and the flailing idiot bombing thoughts in this thread.

Smuggling a nuke into S Korea? That would imply N Korea had any form of competence. They can't even keep the electricity on 24/7.

And Dangles, can you even name the head of state of Pakistan? And why he was so upset over us killing OBL?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

What does that have to do with you making dopey innuendoes and occasionally demonstrating a lack of understanding?If you are asking if I read the news the answer is yes,whether I believe all I read is in question.BTW,on a global scale,doesn't the fact they are enriching uranium demonstrate a credible level of competence? Are we preparing ourselves for the event of a possible attack because our leader is incompetent?Hmmmm.....

[scottw]

Originally Posted by likwid

There's a very big difference between "taking threats seriously" and the flailing idiot bombing thoughts in this thread.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

can you name more than one individual who expressed the
thought(s) that you describe in this thread?