| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
01-17-2013, 08:08 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
I agree, it was sleazy. Pres. kids should be off limits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 08:41 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
I agree, it was sleazy. Pres. kids should be off limits.
|
he stated with great sanctimony and a tortured definition of sleazy...  ....it was TRUE ....which is why there's such feigned indignation... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 11:13 AM
|
#3
|
|
sick of bluefish
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 8,672
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
I agree, it was sleazy. Pres. kids should be off limits.
|
it wasnt about the presidents kids, it was about their protection - armed guards. The NRA has a point, the president believes his kids should be guarded with guns, but not everyone elses?
I think its a great point. |
making s-b.com a kinder, gentler place for all 
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 11:25 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Easton, MA
Posts: 5,737
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIJIMMY
it wasnt about the presidents kids, it was about their protection - armed guards. The NRA has a point, the president believes his kids should be guarded with guns, but not everyone elses?
I think its a great point.
|
Exactly, the message being sent is that his children are more important than other people's children. I don't know too many parents who would agree with that. |
Conservatism is not about leaving people behind. Conservatism is about empowering people to catch up, to give them tools at their disposal that make it possible for them to access all the hope, all the promise, all the opportunity that America offers. - Marco Rubio
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 01:38 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIJIMMY
it wasnt about the presidents kids, it was about their protection - armed guards. The NRA has a point, the president believes his kids should be guarded with guns, but not everyone elses?
I think its a great point.
|
Give me a break. When has a President's kids not had protection? Is he the one who assigned protection for the kids? This is a President that has had more death threats then any other President.
Its not that he believes his kids are more important, it is that the risk of something happening to them is so much higher. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 02:10 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
This is a President that has had more death threats then any other President.
Its not that he believes his kids are more important, it is that the risk of something happening to them is so much higher.
|
Huh? I would love to see your source on this please!!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.
|
| |
Hybrid Mode