Bachmann

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Without having any idea who they were, or why they were applaudingIs this any different than your post about the "liberal elite" (or some similiar term) at Wesleyan Univ. booing Scalia? I think you also used the term "Mental disorder" in that post in reference to Libs. ,

NM

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

NM

Paul, what took place at Wesleyan could not be any more different than the incident you referred to.

In your case, no one knows who was applauding, and more importantly, no one knows why.

In the Wesleyan incident, every honest person in the world knows exactly what was taking place. And moreover, no one in the world was surprised at what took place. Because that's the kind of behavior the world expects from many (not all) liberals, when a conservative has the audacity to express his opinion.

There is absolutely zero ambiguity about what took place at Wesleyan.

Paul, liberals claim to stand for inclusiveness and diversity. Yet time and time again, you see anarchist behavior by liberals when conservatives are trying to make a point. Moreover, I don't see many liberals condemning the anarchist behavior. So if someone claims that they are open-minded and caring about free speech, yet they are not appalled at what took place at Wesleyan, but they still believe they are open-minded, then they are delusional.

[likwid]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Paul, liberals claim to stand for inclusiveness and diversity. Yet time and time again, you see anarchist behavior by liberals when conservatives are trying to make a point.