|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
04-11-2012, 08:00 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
huh???
|
nice, paying to undermine America How if someone lies on a registration form is that undermining America if they didn't vote? Weren't some of the names obviously fake?
how would you know? - Well, how would you know that they voted? We've heard many stories about Acorn and voter fraud. I would have thought you could pull up many articles about how numerous folks got arrested for voter fraud related to the Acorn registrations?
|
|
|
|
04-11-2012, 08:23 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
nice, paying to undermine America How if someone lies on a registration form is that undermining America if they didn't vote? Weren't some of the names obviously fake?
how would you know? - Well, how would you know that they voted? We've heard many stories about Acorn and voter fraud. I would have thought you could pull up many articles about how numerous folks got arrested for voter fraud related to the Acorn registrations?
|
Paul, you said earlier you would not have an issue with being required to show an id to vote. All O'Keefe is doing is showing how easy it is to commit voter fraud, and thus highlight the need for some common sense protocals. He's not doing anything wrong.
Common sense suggests that you can't just identify yourself verbally and vote as whomever you say you are. The 2000 presidential election was decisded by a cat's whisker, that clearly shows how vital it is that elections are conducted fairly.
I've asked a few times what the big deal is. Not one liberal has addressed that. Spence says identity verification causes disenfranchisement, which is as hard to type as antidisestablishmentarianism. I'm not suere what it means (I'm not sure what either word means), but I am sure that it's supposed to make id verification look "mean".
I just cannot see how any rational person can feel slighted when asked to show an id to vote. It's about protecting one's rights, not violating one's rights...
|
|
|
|
04-11-2012, 08:36 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Paul, you said earlier you would not have an issue with being required to show an id to vote. All O'Keefe is doing is showing how easy it is to commit voter fraud, and thus highlight the need for some common sense protocals. He's not doing anything wrong.
|
Yes, in my opinion a free Id is not a big deal. But I'm also confused why it is such a big issue if there is no wide spread fraud. O'Keefe isn't showing voter fraud, he is showing registration fraud. I don't know what happens to a registration card that has an obviously fake name.
Last edited by PaulS; 04-11-2012 at 10:09 AM..
Reason: typo
|
|
|
|
04-11-2012, 04:57 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Yes O'Keefe isn't showing voter fraud, he is showing registration fraud. I don't know what happens to a registration card that has an obviously fake name.
|
he went to Holder's primary polling location and demonstrated how easy it would have been to get a ballot and vote...even using the name of a very high level official, the only reason he didn't get a ballot is because he insisted on getting his ID first, the poll worker never asked for an ID and told him that he didn't need it, simply said "sign here"....if it were a dead guy he'd asked for or if Holder decided to not vote in the primary and he'd signed and taken the ballot he could have voted without any issue and no way of anyone knowing that he'd done so...I think that would be voter fraud
how is he showing "registration fraud"? was Holder fraudulently registered?
the fact that this doesn't disturb you beyond venom for O'Keefe & Co. is a little disturbing 
|
|
|
|
04-11-2012, 05:39 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
he went to Holder's primary polling location and demonstrated how easy it would have been to get a ballot and vote... so your saying he voted? B/c otherwise we can only speculate if he could have voted. I know the lemmings have been told to constantly bring up voter fraud but where is the wide spread voter fraud?
the fact that this doesn't disturb you beyond venom for O'Keefe & Co. is a little disturbing 
|
I think what he does his sleazy - the way he constantly lies to people. So I guess people lying doesn't disturb you
If I had venom I would constantly start threads about the minor things that I read about every day. - Like Cantor donating $ to help defeat fellow Repubs. or some racist hacking into roads signs saying T. Martin is N***** or Santorium dropping out b/f the primary in his home state in which he was behind 
|
|
|
|
04-11-2012, 05:45 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
I think what he does his sleazy - the way he constantly lies to people. So I guess people lying doesn't disturb you
|
There's a line between what he does and journalism. What O'Keefe does is a stunt to get himself publicity.
Like with the Acorn videos, he should have mentioned that a number of locations called the police about his actions.
The irony is that the crack head response is to snort more rather than look at the situation objectively. It's the exact same accusation Sowell makes of the Left.
-spence
|
|
|
|
04-11-2012, 06:36 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
There's a line between what he does and journalism. What O'Keefe does is a stunt to get himself publicity.
Like with the Acorn videos, he should have mentioned that a number of locations called the police about his actions.
The irony is that the crack head response is to snort more rather than look at the situation objectively. It's the exact same accusation Sowell makes of the Left.
-spence
|
DJIA 12805.39 ...you need to work a little harder and stop with the crack obsession 
|
|
|
|
04-11-2012, 06:34 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
so your saying he voted? B/c otherwise we can only speculate if he could have voted.
|
Poll Worker: I do. Xxxx 50th Street NW. Okay. [Puts check next to name, indicating someone has shown up to vote.] Will you sign there . . .
Man: I actually forgot my ID.
Poll Worker: You don’t need it; it’s all right.
Poll Worker: As long as you’re in here, and you’re on our list and that’s who you say you are, we’re okay.
he clearly could have... which is the point that can't seem to grasp 
|
|
|
|
04-12-2012, 06:53 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
Poll Worker: I do. Xxxx 50th Street NW. Okay. [Puts check next to name, indicating someone has shown up to vote.] Will you sign there . . .
Man: I actually forgot my ID.
Poll Worker: You don’t need it; it’s all right.
Poll Worker: As long as you’re in here, and you’re on our list and that’s who you say you are, we’re okay.
he clearly could have... which is the point that can't seem to grasp 
|
But he didn't vote. Maybe she was setting him up to see if he voted and then was going to call the cops. So, he didn't vote and there is no voter fraud in this situation. 
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM.
|
| |