|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
03-20-2012, 07:08 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Just the other day you were attacking Obama for his apology...why the change in heart?
More importantly, it's a serious thread. I think your experiences in Iraq and with military leadership could be interesting and insightful. Curious what you've experienced in this context.
-spence
|
|
|
|
03-21-2012, 08:27 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Just the other day you were attacking Obama for his apology...why the change in heart?
More importantly, it's a serious thread. I think your experiences in Iraq and with military leadership could be interesting and insightful. Curious what you've experienced in this context.
-spence
|
I attacked Obama because hespent more energy apologizing for burning a Koran than he expended condemning the subsequent slaughter of innocent Americans.
In this case, an apology is clearly warranted. That would have been the perfect time to remind the Muslim world that that millions of Muslims have been liberated from other, monstrous Muslims, thanks to the US military.
That's all I said, and there's nothing illogical about it.
|
|
|
|
03-23-2012, 06:51 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
I attacked Obama because hespent more energy apologizing for burning a Koran than he expended condemning the subsequent slaughter of innocent Americans.
|
The interesting thing though is that from your perspective the murders were deserving of the apology, yet to many people of Afghanistan the burnings was a worse offense.
Where do you draw the line?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-24-2012, 02:35 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The interesting thing though is that from your perspective the murders were deserving of the apology, yet to many people of Afghanistan the burnings was a worse offense.
Where do you draw the line?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Are you saying murder is no big deal to many people in Afghanistan?
|
|
|
|
03-24-2012, 05:43 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
Are you saying murder is no big deal to many people in Afghanistan?
|
I don't believe I said anything like that.
-spence
|
|
|
|
03-25-2012, 05:59 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
Are you saying murder is no big deal to many people in Afghanistan?
|
I'll say it. Let me re-phrase, to many people there, murder is a big deal, it's a cause for celebration.
PaulS, I didn't blame all liberals for what happened at Wesleyan...please stop putting radical jibberish in my mouth. What I say is fair game, don't make stuff up please. I do blame any liberals who won't condemn as hateful intolerance the act of throwing condoms at a sitting justice of the supreme Court.
|
|
|
|
03-26-2012, 07:40 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
PaulS, I didn't blame all liberals for what happened at Wesleyan
|
But that is how your posts constantly come across. It is like if I was petty enough to start a thread "Conservative Classlessness" about the woman who yelled to Santorum to make believe it was Obama when he was at the firing range.
And I didn't see you condem that either - what does that mean?
|
|
|
|
03-26-2012, 07:55 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
But that is how your posts constantly come across. It is like if I was petty enough to start a thread "Conservative Classlessness" about the woman who yelled to Santorum to make believe it was Obama when he was at the firing range.
And I didn't see you condem that either - what does that mean?
|
"But that is how your posts constantly come across."
I can't help how you interpret my posts.
"I didn't see you condem that either - what does that mean?"
Obviously, it means that I had no knowledge of the issue you were referring to.
Paul, I would never say that all liberals are rude, nor would I ever say that all conservatives are polite and respectful. However, in my opinion, when you see things like condoms thrown at Justice Scalia, that type of anarchist, close-minded hate is disproportionately conducted by liberals. And I find that interesting, since liberals claim to be about inclusuion and open-mindedness.
|
|
|
|
03-25-2012, 06:06 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The interesting thing though is that from your perspective the murders were deserving of the apology, yet to many people of Afghanistan the burnings was a worse offense.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Which shows you how insane those people are you're referring to. If a large group of people really believe that a piece of paper is worth more than a human life (any human life), then the president (especially one who has the Nobel Peace Prize under his belt) should recognize his obligation to set these people straight about their priorities, and to warn them what will happen if they target innocent westerners.
I'd also like him to tell the Muslim that they should be getting on their knees and thanking the US military for trying to free them from enslavement at the hands of other, monstrous Muslims. No greater love hath man than he who lays down his life for another, and many Americans have risjked precisely that in trying to bring freedom to these people. As one of those who has bled over there, it would sure be nice to hear him articulate it that way, especially to those who need to hear it.
|
|
|
|
03-25-2012, 08:12 PM
|
#10
|
Hardcore Equipment Tester
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Abington, MA
Posts: 6,234
|
I read this on another site, and after thinking about it, it is so true.
Quote:
After reading the headlines about the US soldier who shot up Afghanistan civilians, I couldn't help noticing an irony. There is all this clamor to try this guy quickly and execute him, never mind his having suffered a traumatic brain injury.
Yet this Major Hasan, who shot up Fort Hood while screaming Allah akbar, still hasn't stood trial, and they are still debating whether he was insane, even with the clear evidence regarding his motive: slay as many infidels as possible.
So we have a guy in a war zone who cracks, and he must be executed immediately.
But this Muslim psychiatrist who was stateside in a nice safe office all day murders 13, wounds 29 of our own guys, and they try to argue the poor lad suffered post-traumatic stress syndrome, from listening to real soldiers who had actual battle experience. Two and a half years later, they still haven't tried the murderous bastard.
|
|
Bent Rods and Screaming Reels!
Spot NAZI
|
|
|
03-26-2012, 07:08 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSpecialist
I read this on another site, and after thinking about it, it is so true.
|
EXACTLY.
Here's the difference. The people that Hasan killed (US soldiers) have not been anointed with "victim" status by the American left. In fact, that story was buried as much as possible by the liberals, because the murderer was a Muslim, and thus he HAS been anointed with "victim"status by the American left.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.
|
| |