|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Computers Sidetrack to Computers, Questions on your home computer? Posting just for registered members.... |
 |
02-03-2012, 11:41 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: A village some where
Posts: 3,436
|
So you ate right in the range very nice. The only wat you could get more " bang for you buck " with what you have is to upgrad to Docsis3, cox offers a slamming gateway ( modem router combo) that rocks or you can get a Docsis3 modem, but yhen you would need a router upgrade and then it would all be for not if your xbox ethernet port is just 10/100 which i think it is. You could go with a wirless N adapter but in my opinion its not worth it.
So in my opionion you would get better responce times (ping times) but over all your speeds are awesome for your package, and unless xbox has a 10/100/1000 lan port upgrading your equipment at this time is not worth the investment if all is working..
Just out of curiosity where did you test your speed?
Cox has a speed test in thete internet tools site now, you can test right off cox.com
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 12:55 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SOCO
Posts: 1,995
|
I tested my speed on the cox website, I had to look up what my actual package was and I saw the test tool. This was on the desktop which is also plugged into the router. So looks like the answer to my initial question whether plugging into the older router slows down the speed, is that it is not an issue.
I googled the xbox lan speed, as far as I can tell, it is 100. I do have a wireless N adaptor for it, but I went back to the hard wire as my router is only a G and I was also having some interference issues. Are you saying that using the wireless N with a better router could give me better speed than the ethernet cable with the 100 speed?
I'll look into the cox gateway thing, my wife does a lot of photoagraphy and uploads to facebook groups a lot, from the laptop, so could have some benefits there
Thanks for your helping me understand this stuff!
|
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 02:45 PM
|
#3
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,339
|
XBOX on Wireless N will not be faster than connected by Ethernet (packet overhead, interference, and a myriad of other reasons).
Both good signal wireless (possibly exluding wireless "B") and ethernet will be faster than the likely maximum broadband pipe currently available in 99% of American homes
|
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 07:39 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: A village some where
Posts: 3,436
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR
XBOX on Wireless N will not be faster than connected by Ethernet (packet overhead, interference, and a myriad of other reasons).
Both good signal wireless (possibly exluding wireless "B") and ethernet will be faster than the likely maximum broadband pipe currently available in 99% of American homes
|
John i think you and i will agree to disagree about the wireless, i feel that you can obtain a equal if not faster signal if the conditions are right, however as i previously stated i didn't feel he had anything to gain via his xbox with a upgrade, now if his wife is sending pics and larger files that gateway is the way to go with N technology as well as multi channel bonding wouldn't you agree, especially if multiple devices are accessing in the inet at the same time?
|
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 PM.
|
| |