|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
01-14-2012, 09:15 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 3,650
|
In the wake of the incendiary bombing of Hamburg 40,000 people died in the napalm-fueled firestorm and another 37,000 were injured in one week. There would have been no insurgency had we bombed Iraq similarly.
From a military perspective, the insurgency was enabled by our generosity of restraint. In retrospect, we should have struck like Jehovah and left no doubt as to our supremacy.
|
|
|
|
01-14-2012, 09:38 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe
There would have been no insurgency had we bombed Iraq similarly.
|
Correct, it would have not been an insurgency isolated to Iraq.
More likely it would have erupted into a broader war across the entire middle east.
-spence
|
|
|
|
01-14-2012, 11:00 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,885
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe
In retrospect, we should have struck like Jehovah and left no doubt as to our supremacy.
|
I think the connection between wwii and Iraq is a stretch. The German's were the aggressors with a clear plan for world domination. Such a campaign in Iraq would not have been supported by the American people or the global community because of the lack of clear reasons for the war and the false pretenses presented by the president and his cronies. Demonstrates why it to stupid to make up reasons to go to war.
|
No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
|
|
|
01-14-2012, 11:24 AM
|
#4
|
time to go
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy
I think the connection between wwii and Iraq is a stretch. The German's were the aggressors with a clear plan for world domination. Such a campaign in Iraq would not have been supported by the American people or the global community because of the lack of clear reasons for the war and the false pretenses presented by the president and his cronies. Demonstrates why it to stupid to make up reasons to go to war.
|
False pretenses? I know WMD's has the left insinuated was the only reason we went in. It wasn't the only reason we went in, how many resolutions should we have let them violate before taking action, how many of our planes needed to be shot at before we responded?
And they had WMD's because we sold them to Iraq. where did they go? It's a giant litter box over there do you think they might have buried them? They had months to hide/dispose of them before we actually invaded, so they knew we were coming.
Also if you claim finding WMD's was the only reason technically we did:
Wikileaks documents show WMDs found in Iraq Hot Air
Saddam’s WMDhave been found
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918
I don't see things through a political affiliation type filter, I don't like either party.
http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripert...me-change.html
Last edited by ecduzitgood; 01-14-2012 at 11:34 AM..
|
|
|
|
01-14-2012, 11:47 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,885
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecduzitgood
|
Really, yet you get your info from hotair.com? Ever hear of PNAC? The plan for invasion was laid out long before 9/11 and Bush used every excuse he could think of to moved forward with the "cavalry on the new American frontier." Even in the months prior to the war, when one reason didn't stand up, they found a new one.
|
No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
|
|
|
01-14-2012, 01:21 PM
|
#6
|
time to go
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy
Really, yet you get your info from hotair.com? Ever hear of PNAC? The plan for invasion was laid out long before 9/11 and Bush used every excuse he could think of to moved forward with the "cavalry on the new American frontier." Even in the months prior to the war, when one reason didn't stand up, they found a new one.
|
Actually that just came up in a fast search so I posted it along with other links pointing out the lame attempt to discredit the republicans. Repeating it over and over won't work when there are facts that totally discredit the no WMD's argument.
Nice attempt at deflecting though....bump
Which party perpetuated lies and still has followers believing them??????
Last edited by ecduzitgood; 01-14-2012 at 01:24 PM..
Reason: The olive branch has fallen :(
|
|
|
|
01-14-2012, 01:32 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecduzitgood
Which party perpetuated lies and still has followers believing them??????
|
"it all has to do with your state of mind and whether or not you had the requisite intent to come up with something that would be considered a lie"
|
|
|
|
01-14-2012, 01:56 PM
|
#8
|
time to go
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
"it all has to do with your state of mind and whether or not you had the requisite intent to come up with something that would be considered a lie"
|
Your right I suppose they were willing to grasp any straw to smear the other party, both parties should hang their heads in shame and get back to doing what's right for the country not just their party of affiliation. We are all in the same boat and it is going down
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 AM.
|
| |