| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
11-17-2011, 01:48 PM
|
#1
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,206
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
the cheating is between the husband and wife in my opinion
the servicing of interns or by interns of the executive in the office is something more than simply between the husband and wife..
.....or do you disagree with that?
I'm pretty sure that prior to Monica, everyone knew that he cheated on his wife repeatedly...continually getting elected must be feel
quite enabling  |
Depends...if it isn't affecting the business...I still feel its between the Husband, the wife, and the intern.....but a situation like that can definitely erode the functioning of an office environment....if thats the case then it becomes a problem.
Do you feel then that a cheater or womanizer shouldn't be considered for office? |
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
|
11-17-2011, 02:47 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
Do you feel then that a cheater or womanizer shouldn't be considered for office?
|
my personal opinion is that if someone can't be honest in the most basic arrangement, marriage, and can "cheat" on their spouse and then look them in the eye each day as if nothing is happening and cause the kind of pain that follows when the truth comes to light, then they are likely capable of much worse given power through an elected office..so, it is a problem for me when it is discovered about a candidate as much as and probably more so as if they cheated on their taxes, were involved in questionable dealings or with dubious characters...it all goes to character ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-17-2011, 03:33 PM
|
#3
|
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,413
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
my personal opinion is that if someone can't be honest in the most basic arrangement, marriage, and can "cheat" on their spouse and then look them in the eye each day as if nothing is happening and cause the kind of pain that follows when the truth comes to light, then they are likely capable of much worse given power through an elected office..so, it is a problem for me when it is discovered about a candidate as much as and probably more so as if they cheated on their taxes, were involved in questionable dealings or with dubious characters...it all goes to character ...
|
What if Newt is the nominee running against Obama...
Do you vote? or stay home? |
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
|
|
11-17-2011, 05:12 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
What if Newt is the nominee running against Obama...
Do you vote? or stay home?
|
don't know, he's a serial cheater and therefore fundamentally dishonest with people that he loved enough to wed...if you are #3 do you really think "you're the one"?...not good, guess I'd have to determine who is more fundamentally dishonest...would be a tough call... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-18-2011, 02:55 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gloucester Massachusetts
Posts: 2,678
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
What if Newt is the nominee running against Obama...
Do you vote? or stay home?
|
VOTE REPUBLICAN!!!! 
The lesser of two evils. |
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 AM.
|
| |
Hybrid Mode