| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
04-17-2011, 05:49 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 98
|
This 1@36 is for you big cow hunters.How about someone who fishes back rivers(me).There was only one striper taken @36 in the last 5 years.I know there might be bigger in these rivers but big stripers are NOT that common in the rivers i fish.I don't speek just for myself there are alot of guys that fish these rivers and have become use to catching what the river supplies us for fish.Used to be great fishing in these waters but with all the abuse to bait fish,striper killers(murderers)our part of the eco chain is starving.There is a pogey trauler that is allowed permision to do there business in our main river that feeds the smaller rivers that we fish.They take the majority of everyone's catch along with most all the pogeys.Fishing dramaticly takes a dive the day they traul the river.So how do you make it fair for guys that river fish where the stock might not allow you to take even one fish all season.
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2011, 07:06 AM
|
#2
|
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,424
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by striper774
This 1@36 is for you big cow hunters.How about someone who fishes back rivers(me).
|
To be blunt, I say tough #^&#^&#^&#^&.
1@36 worked in the moratorium years. combined with reduced commercial pressure, the bass would be a lot better off!
I am firmly convinced SF has not come out in favor of 1@36" b/c most of the members can't catch fish at 36".
Last couple of years the fluke limit (20.5" at one point) limited many anglers, especially those that didn't adapt, to not catching many 'keepers'. So what, them's the rules.
If it is better for the bass, suck it up, adapt and change tactics. you'll find some bigger fish
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
04-17-2011, 07:57 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
To be blunt, I say tough #^&#^&#^&#^&.
1@36 worked in the moratorium years. combined with reduced commercial pressure, the bass would be a lot better off!
I am firmly convinced SF has not come out in favor of 1@36" b/c most of the members can't catch fish at 36".
Last couple of years the fluke limit (20.5" at one point) limited many anglers, especially those that didn't adapt, to not catching many 'keepers'. So what, them's the rules.
If it is better for the bass, suck it up, adapt and change tactics. you'll find some bigger fish
|
It is tough chit that we all have to go through this.You can tell me all you want to change my tactics i'll get bigger fish.That's not the point.If they come up with a 36'limit i'll abide by the law.What i was trying to get was a way the angler that has slim to no chance to catch a fish that size.Come fish where we do and see how you like it.Maby you could explain to me how to change my tactics to catch a bigger fish.
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2011, 08:47 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 75
|
selfish reasons
Those of you who don't want to change and save the bass fine, when you catch nothing in a few years you can ask yourself why and look in the mirror.  Conservation starts at home,some of you are hell bent on watching the stocks crash because you don't want people to"tell you" how to fish. You have every right to do that and will pay the price in the long run.The price is no fish, if that is what you want ok.if you don't then you will have to change your position. If you eat doughnuts all day and the doctor tells you you are going to get diabetes but you refuse to listen because you have the" right to eat them" fine,but don't blame the doctor when you have to inject insulin everyday to stay alive.  Like I said,every decision has a consequence.
|
|
|
|
|
04-18-2011, 03:28 AM
|
#5
|
|
Very Grumpy bay man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 10,903
|
Come fish where we do and see how you like it.Maby you could explain to me how to change my tactics to catch a bigger fish.[/QUOTE]
I am sorry. I do not get your point. If there are no 36" fish where you fish, then go somewhere else where there are. It is really simple.
Just because you are obviously, fishing in a a striper nursery, doesn't mean we have to keep the size limit down.
BTW, it is not about YOU! It is about developing and keeping a sustainable fishery.
|
No boat, back in the suds. 
|
|
|
04-19-2011, 05:08 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by piemma
Come fish where we do and see how you like it.Maby you could explain to me how to change my tactics to catch a bigger fish.
|
I am sorry. I do not get your point. If there are no 36" fish where you fish, then go somewhere else where there are. It is really simple.
Just because you are obviously, fishing in a a striper nursery, doesn't mean we have to keep the size limit down.
BTW, it is not about YOU! It is about developing and keeping a sustainable fishery.[/QUOTE]
Your right it's not about me it's about the fish.My point was to let people know what's happened to the fish that used to be abundent in these rivers.Maby now you could call it a nursery.I like the back rivers and small stripers are also fun to catch on ultra lite tackle.The thing that bothers me is not being able to feed my friend who is in failing health due to serving our country years ago.I don't have much opportunity to get around to different spots to fish.So ok 36" it is.Who is going to help me with my mission to keep a fillet or two in my freezer to help someone that in a short while you can say gave his life for his country and fellow man.I only take to feed them as it is an ultimate reward for my soul to sit and eat with him something he loves.It's an honor and a privlege to be in his company.You can tell me tough chit all you want,i guess it is.
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2011, 05:10 AM
|
#7
|
|
Very Grumpy bay man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 10,903
|
|
No boat, back in the suds. 
|
|
|
04-19-2011, 07:13 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gloucester Massachusetts
Posts: 2,678
|
Even tho female striped bass can reproduce at the age of four years, many do not spawn at that age. Normally they do not start to spawn till the age of six years and at this age they average a length of twenty eight inches and therefore you have the regs mostly set at a legal minimum catch size of 28 inches, giving the striper at least one spawning year before being caught. Maybe they should raise the keeper size limit so that the female can get two or three seasons to spawn. Remember that when they re-opened the catching of striped bass the size was about 34 inches to keep and the fish rebounded to great numbers which gave them six spawning years before going on the dinner table. Some striper's do not spawn every year.
And for anyone to blame the Striper Club for the reduction of the striped bass population is absurd. You have bait and tackle shops, clubs and bar rooms up and down the coast holding tournaments.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM.
|
| |