Rush and Pat Robertson

[scottw]

Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND

If you do happen to believe in human induce climate change, this is actually a really bad thing, because it could mass the effects we have w/ CO2 and then when sunspots go back to normal....

ahhhh so, now AGW is "HICC"? how about we just settle on BS ?....

fixed for ya

[spence]

Originally Posted by scottw

ahhhh so, now AGW is "HICL"? how about we just settle on BS ?....

What's HICL? Please...start enlightening us.

-spence

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

What's HICL? Please...start enlightening us.

-spence

oops...HICC "Human Induced Climate Change" as stated by ROCK ....wasamadda.....you get the point...first it's one thing...then when that doesn't quite work out....it's another thing....

[spence]

Originally Posted by scottw

oops...HICC "Human Induced Climate Change" as stated by ROCK ....wasamadda.....you get the point...first it's one thing...then when that doesn't quite work out....it's another thing....

Usually when arguing with a scientist is pays to get one's facts straight.

-spence

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Usually when arguing with a scientist is pays to get one's facts straight.

-spence

I mistyped a letter...the so-called "scientists" have competely f*%$*d with the "facts" I guess being a "scientist" doesn't necessarily or automatically make you right...

I have about as much regard for the "scientists" that continue to push the climate change/AGW/human induced whatever scam as I do for Jonh Murtha and his opionions on the military....

just as Obama is showing now...time exposes frauds...you should keep defending both though...the folks that continue support these myths are quickly dwindling and they really need your help.....

[spence]

Originally Posted by scottw

I mistyped a letter...the so-called "scientists" have competely f*%$*d with the "facts" I guess being a "scientist" doesn't necessarily or automatically make you right...

I have about as much regard for the "scientists" that continue to push the climate change/AGW/human induced whatever scam as I do for Jonh Murtha and his opionions on the military....

just as Obama is showing now...time exposes frauds...you should keep defending both though...the folks that continue support these myths are quickly dwindling and they really need your help.....

Pretty arrogant to think that you, a non-scientist, who doesn't even know what this stuff is called, can mockingly discredit several thousand experts.

But you could be right in the end. After all, Rush Limbaugh did observe it was colder than usual the other day.

-spence

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Pretty arrogant to think that you, a non-scientist, who doesn't even know what this stuff is called, can mockingly discredit several thousand experts.name them...several thousand...just go with a million..it's much more convincing, I didn't mock or discredit them, their actions and the facts have done that....

But you could be right in the end. After all, Rush Limbaugh did observe it was colder than usual the other day.

-spence

when the "scientists" finally decide on a name for "this stuff" that they can settle on with their "settled science"...you'll please let me know, won't ya Spence?

did you think it was arrogant that, Obama, a "non-scientist" thought he could lower the sea levels?

How about them Nobel "Scientists"?
The Indian head of the UN climate change panel defended his position yesterday even as further errors were identified in the panel's assessment of Himalayan glaciers.

Dr Rajendra Pachauri dismissed calls for him to resign over the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change’s retraction of a prediction that Himalayan glaciers could disappear by 2035.

But he admitted that there may have been other errors in the same section of the report, and said that he was considering whether to take action against those responsible.

“I know a lot of climate sceptics are after my blood, but I’m in no mood to oblige them,” he told The Times in an interview. “It was a collective failure by a number of people,” he said. “I need to consider what action to take, but that will take several weeks. It’s best to think with a cool head, rather than shoot from the hip.”

Related Links
UN climate chief admits mistake on glaciers alert
World misled over glacier meltdown

The IPCC’s 2007 report, which won it the Nobel Peace Prize, said that the probability of Himalayan glaciers “disappearing by the year 2035 and perhaps sooner is very high”.

But it emerged last week that the forecast was based not on a consensus among climate change experts, but on a media interview with a single Indian glaciologist in 1999.

The IPCC admitted on Thursday that the prediction was “poorly substantiated” in the latest of a series of blows to the panel’s credibility.