|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
12-01-2009, 05:48 PM
|
#1
|
Too old to give a....
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,519
|
I remember well my last day of being a com guy.
27 beautiful fish all over the deck. For what ? A few hundred bucks.
So for the greater good I swore I would never willfully kill another one.
Just my feelings, not preaching to anyone.
|
May fortune favor the foolish....
|
|
|
12-02-2009, 06:34 PM
|
#2
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,365
|
I'm not hugely against commercial fishing for bass but I do think we need to take Rec & Comm back to when it was one fish for rec, 800K for commercial and THEN take a third off the top. That would put a dent in both.
We still gotta find out how legit this is and if so, does it have legs.
|
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
12-04-2009, 01:15 PM
|
#3
|
Land OF Forgotten Toys
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Central MA
Posts: 2,309
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR
I'm not hugely against commercial fishing for bass but I do think we need to take Rec & Comm back to when it was one fish for rec, 800K for commercial and THEN take a third off the top. That would put a dent in both.
We still gotta find out how legit this is and if so, does it have legs.
|
This is extremely legit. The bill has been sponsored for over a year and you are hearing about it now because it made it to committee. Once the committee decides it is worthy of a vote in the house it will be in fact a bill.
I have personally sent over 100 handwritten letters in support of this to the MA legislature and countless e-mails.
The commercial striped bass industry in Massachusetts is second in take only to Maryland. Eliminating the commercial market in MA and reducing the Rec take to one fish a day goes a long way in conserving the striped Bass. I am surprised this is news to everyone.
Stripers Forever is hardly an Elitist group. It is a group that is run by volunteers has and spends every dime it receives to conserve and protect the Striped Bass. To think the members of Stripers Forever are a bunch of Orvis Casting Land Rover Driving elitists is simply ignorant.
|
I am the man in the Bassless Chaps
|
|
|
12-04-2009, 02:00 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 5,238
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackbass
The commercial striped bass industry in Massachusetts is second in take only to Maryland. Eliminating the commercial market in MA and reducing the Rec take to one fish a day goes a long way in conserving the striped Bass. I am surprised this is news to everyone.
Stripers Forever is hardly an Elitist group. It is a group that is run by volunteers has and spends every dime it receives to conserve and protect the Striped Bass. To think the members of Stripers Forever are a bunch of Orvis Casting Land Rover Driving elitists is simply ignorant.
|
My understanding is that eliminating the Commercial Season in MA will only allow for that tonnage of fish to be distributed to other states. Where exactly is the net gain for the Striped Bass?
Selfishly, it will be nice not to have Comms cherry-picking the biggest fish around and being without the ones you sometimes encounter that act like they own the ocean (this is the minority though).
|
|
|
|
12-04-2009, 02:34 PM
|
#5
|
Geezer Gone Wild
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,397
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackbass
... To think the members of Stripers Forever are a bunch of Orvis Casting Land Rover Driving elitists is simply ignorant.
|
...  ...  ...
Great way win friends and educate the Woefully Uninformed, there, Skippy...particularly on your 5th post... 
|
"There is no royal road to this heavy surf-fishing. With all the appliances for comfort experience can suggest, there is a certain amount of hard work to be done and exposure to be bourne as a part of the price of success." From "Striped Bass," Scribner's Magazine, 1881.
|
|
|
12-04-2009, 02:52 PM
|
#6
|
........
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
|
Careful Crafty
his middle initial stands for bad
|
|
|
|
12-04-2009, 03:34 PM
|
#7
|
Calling Jon The Fisherman
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Sack Of Mass
Posts: 2,357
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR
I'm not hugely against commercial fishing for bass but I do think we need to take Rec & Comm back to when it was one fish for rec, 800K for commercial and THEN take a third off the top. That would put a dent in both.
We still gotta find out how legit this is and if so, does it have legs.
|
Biggest problem I see with the commercial fishery is that the guys who are good are trained assassins. They can hover over a body of big fish and do some real damage. Bodies of fish are vulnerable to being wiped out if the fleet anchors up over their heads. If these guys take their 30 fish from a pod of 100, that's a third of a migrating or resident pod of fish that has likely been programmed (genetically) to run a certain route, breed a certain river. Take a third away--that's bad enough--but what about when the other 15 boats within binocular range come motoring over to drop their yo-yo's how many are left then?
I've seen some great hauls come into the commercial place near my house---seen many 50's and a 64 there. But they don't hold a candle to the thousands of 30's I've seen stiff and covered with crushed ice. It really does need to stop.
We should not support the Striper Cup either though... that list of pin winner is like Schindlers List for striped bass
A high percentage of the commercial guys DO NOT NEED TO BE FISHING TO SUSTAIN THEMSELVES ANYWAY. It's a double-paid vacation for them.
If we are to keep the commercial fishery alive, you should have to prove that commercial fishing makes up more that 50% of your yearly income.
-Dave
|
Surf Asylum Lures, Custom Lures for the "Committed"
Official S-B Sponsor
|
|
|
12-04-2009, 05:57 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Franklin Ma
Posts: 402
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canalman
A high percentage of the commercial guys DO NOT NEED TO BE FISHING TO SUSTAIN THEMSELVES ANYWAY. It's a double-paid vacation for them.
If we are to keep the commercial fishery alive, you should have to prove that commercial fishing makes up more that 50% of your yearly income.
|
I couldn't disagree more.
I fish comm in RI and pull an average 3-6K(since 2000) a year between bass, fluke, seabass, scup, blues, etc.. Provides pocket money for me all year that doesn't come out of my paycheck(which pays mortgage, bills, etc..) Probably couldn't afford to fish or do many other things with my family without the extra money I make fishing.
Every comm guy I know makes money some other way than fishing as well. If we're going to start banning people who don't make 50% of their living from one trade, why wouldn't we also bar comm fishermen from participating in any other trade in order to supplement income? There's very few guys making a living on fishing only. So to be fair, no carpentry, plumbing, landscaping, etc.. unless it's 50% or more of their income. That's a tremendously slippery slope to go down. People should be able to diversify their income sources as long as they have adequate skills to do so.
Double paid vacation? So what? What's wrong with making money doing something you love?
Last edited by Brian L; 12-05-2009 at 12:55 PM..
|
|
|
|
12-04-2009, 07:56 PM
|
#9
|
Too old to give a....
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,519
|
When you absolutely want the worse outcome of a situation.
Use completely diametrical points of view.
We are all screwed.
Really is a question of do we want to catch fish and/or keep fish and trust magic to replace them.
I have an easier time discussing string theory and quantum physics with Sweetwater. 
|
May fortune favor the foolish....
|
|
|
12-04-2009, 08:56 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 5,238
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAKAI
When you absolutely want the worse outcome of a situation.
Use completely diametrical points of view.
We are all screwed.
Really is a question of do we want to catch fish and/or keep fish and trust magic to replace them.
I have an easier time discussing string theory and quantum physics with Sweetwater.
|
That's only because by the time string theory pops up, you're into the second bottle of Macallan and everything someone makes sense.
|
|
|
|
12-04-2009, 11:23 PM
|
#11
|
Too old to give a....
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,519
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyD
That's only because by the time string theory pops up, you're into the second bottle of Macallan and everything someone makes sense.
|
By the time we are waxing poetic about the universe, and the fate of man. You young ones are all tucked in. By the way scotch taste better when in deep discourse, fine cigar smoke swirling amid the stars. 
|
May fortune favor the foolish....
|
|
|
12-04-2009, 08:05 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Rockland, MA
Posts: 651
|
Ya I know...all the fisheries managers are liars or in someones pocket, comm guys are poaching crooks,......lets let stripers forever and a bunch of pol's decide what's best. 
|
|
|
|
12-04-2009, 08:35 PM
|
#13
|
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
|
Seems to me if we just nuke NJ there will be enough fish for everyone else.
|
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29 PM.
|
| |