Mastermind

[buckman]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

No one was screaming terrorists when abortion clinics were getting bombed. Or did not enough people die in those incidents?

I rememeber the outcry. Yes they were.
IMO you can't equate someone trying to protect an innocent unborn child with someone killing 3000 . It's not right but it's not the same

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by buckman

I rememeber the outcry. Yes they were.
IMO you can't equate someone trying to protect an innocent unborn child with someone killing 3000 . It's not right but it's not the same

There was an outcry, but people weren't screaming "terrorists". So, if you bomb a clinic to "protect an innocent unborn child" then that's not terrorism, but shooting people in the name of religion (which we still don't know is fully the case) is terrorism?

You sure can equate it. Killing is killing, isn't it? This isn't directed towards you, but I love the religious hypocrisy of murdering an abortion doctor being acceptable to some people because he's, in their opinion, murdering babies.

We've had this discussion before where you've made the comparison to the number of people killed during 9/11. What exactly is the number of people that must be killed for a situation to be considered terrorism? The interesting part is that we weren't even talking about 9/11.

[buckman]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

There was an outcry, but people weren't screaming "terrorists". So, if you bomb a clinic to "protect an innocent unborn child" then that's not terrorism, but shooting people in the name of religion (which we still don't know is fully the case) is terrorism?

You sure can equate it. Killing is killing, isn't it? This isn't directed towards you, but I love the religious hypocrisy of murdering an abortion doctor being acceptable to some people because he's, in their opinion, murdering babies.

We've had this discussion before where you've made the comparison to the number of people killed during 9/11. What exactly is the number of people that must be killed for a situation to be considered terrorism? The interesting part is that we weren't even talking about 9/11.

99.999% of Christians would call the taking of any life wrong JD. Why are you so quick to call the killing of an abortion DR terrorism but give this terrorist the benifit of the doubt.
FYI, his clock was set at 9/11 at his apartment but thats just a coincidence.

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by buckman

99.999% of Christians would call the taking of any life wrong JD. Why are you so quick to call the killing of an abortion DR terrorism but give this terrorist the benifit of the doubt.
FYI, his clock was set at 9/11 at his apartment but thats just a coincidence.

I'm not calling either terrorism.

And I know a lot of Christians that are in support of the Death Penalty.

[buckman]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

I'm not calling either terrorism.

And I know a lot of Christians that are in support of the Death Penalty.

Me for one. I'm able to see the difference between a innocent unborn child and a murdering scum bag. You can too, you just won't admit it.

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by buckman

Me for one. I'm able to see the difference between a innocent unborn child and a murdering scum bag. You can too, you just won't admit it.

Well, you're a bad Christian then.

Thou shall not kill.

You do keep twisting the topic though. This isn't a comparison between abortion and murder.

[buckman]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

Well, you're a bad Christian then.

Thou shall not kill.

You do keep twisting the topic though. This isn't a comparison between abortion and murder.

I think I'll be Ok when Peter calls my name at the gate