|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
03-28-2009, 07:06 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sturbridge MA
Posts: 3,127
|
Does the surfcaster catalog still have the AWD Astro van in it? I was considering one a while back when i first got into fishing because i thought it would be a good vehicle. Then after driving beaches the past couple years, even without ever driving a AWD vehicle i wouldnt do it without 4WD.
|
Everything is better on the rocks.
|
|
|
03-28-2009, 08:19 AM
|
#2
|
Jiggin' Leper Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: 61° 30′ 0″ N, 23° 46′ 0″ E
Posts: 8,159
|
Most of the early "AWD" vehicles--like Priestberger's Astro mini-van and my wife's Exploder--were actually full time 4wd, with power permanently distributed in the ratio of 60% to the rear wheels and 40% to the front. Same with Jeep's old Quadra-Trac full time 4wd. None of them had low ranges. The original Quadra-Trac Jeeps had a switch inside the glove compartment whereby you could lock the transfer case so that the front and rear axles would turn at the same ratio, but that was about it for tough going. I've run a Grand Cherokee, a small Cherokee, an old Wagoneer and a K-5 Blazer on beaches all over the Northeast and I've never had to drop any of them into low range. My current vehicle has never been in low range, ever. When I had a old box on wheels Trooper with an anemic 4 banger under the hood, I ran that in low range, but not because I had to to avoid getting stuck--I did it so I wouldn't be constantly driving in first gear.
Of course, I air down and I've been driving on beaches for almost 30 years, so YMMV 
|
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
|
|
|
03-28-2009, 03:14 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: weymouth
Posts: 1,360
|
I used low range because I wanted to put less stress on the engine pushing through the sand.
|
thats why they call it fishing not catching
|
|
|
03-28-2009, 04:00 PM
|
#4
|
Jiggin' Leper Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: 61° 30′ 0″ N, 23° 46′ 0″ E
Posts: 8,159
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by quick decision
I used low range because I wanted to put less stress on the engine pushing through the sand.
|
You shouldn't be "pushing" through the sand if you've aired down to the right pressure.
If you take your foot off the gas and your truck doesn't coast for more than a few inches, you haven't aired down enough.
|
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
|
|
|
03-28-2009, 06:10 PM
|
#5
|
Retired Surfer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sunset Grill
Posts: 9,511
|
I like my ranger but I miss my F-250. That being said the only time I ever had the 250 in low low was to tow some fool out that did not lower his tires to the prescribed amount.
|
Swimmer a.k.a. YO YO MA
Serial Mailbox Killer/Seal Fisherman
|
|
|
03-28-2009, 03:24 PM
|
#6
|
Old Guy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 8,760
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike P
The original Quadra-Trac Jeeps had a switch inside the glove compartment whereby you could lock the transfer case so that the front and rear axles would turn at the same ratio, but that was about it for tough going.
|
I had a 78, the switch said only if all 4 wheels were spinning, I used it as a sank in a muddle puddle above the bumper in North West NJ. Left the muffler there, the only time I ever got mud in the middle of the roof of that thing it was the most powerful vehicle I ever had
|
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.
|
| |