Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » The Scuppers

The Scuppers This is a new forum for the not necessarily fishing related topics...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-04-2007, 11:02 AM   #1
UserRemoved1
Permanently Disconnected
iTrader: (-9)
 
UserRemoved1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,647
Drunk of the day

Charges tossed in DWI scooter case
By Kim Ring TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF

BROOKFIELD— [/B] The case against a Brookfield man charged with driving drunk on his scooter, then cracking open a bottle of vodka in the back of a police cruiser was dismissed yesterday after the town’s police chief did not appear in Western Worcester District Court, East Brookfield, to testify.

Sean E. Pray, 41, of 106 Quaboag St., was arrested in July after Chief Ross B. Ackerman allegedly spotted Mr. Pray’s scooter weaving across the lanes near his home. Chief Ackerman stopped Mr. Pray, who he believed was intoxicated, and arrested him. Chief Ackerman wrote in his report that he heard a noise and checked the back seat only to find Mr. Pray had opened a bottle of vodka, spilling some in the process.

Mr. Pray was charged with a second offense of drunken driving, driving an unregistered motor vehicle, driving an uninsured motor vehicle and a marked lanes violation. He also was charged with having an open container of alcohol in a motor vehicle.

All of the charges were dismissed without prejudice.

Officials said summonses are sent to law enforcement personnel when cases are headed to trial. The summonses serve as notification for them to appear and testify.

Chief Ackerman was paged but did not return calls seeking comment last night.

In the days after the incident, Chief Ackerman said he intended to file an additional charge of threatening to commit a crime against Mr. Pray. He said then that Mr. Pray had left a message on the police department’s voice mail that said, “The officer who arrested me is going to burn for this.”

Court personnel said yesterday that charge was never filed.


ROFLMAO Guy's got nads
UserRemoved1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:14 AM   #2
Sluggoslinger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 794
Good to see are justice department working so well! Nice job guys. We'll be reading about this guy hitting some kids waiting for the bus one day because he thinks he's invincible now.
Sluggoslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:26 AM   #3
Backbeach Jake
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Backbeach Jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Here and There Seasonally
Posts: 5,985
Angry

Something is bad wrong when ya get charged with open container in the back odf a cruiser and the chief can't be bothered to show in court. Why didn't he mix the doof a couple? Citizens of Brookfield, you need a new chief of police.

He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.
Thomas Paine
Backbeach Jake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 12:10 PM   #4
Mike P
Jiggin' Leper Lawyer
iTrader: (0)
 
Mike P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: 61° 30′ 0″ N, 23° 46′ 0″ E
Posts: 8,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backbeach Jake View Post
Something is bad wrong when ya get charged with open container in the back odf a cruiser and the chief can't be bothered to show in court. Why didn't he mix the doof a couple? Citizens of Brookfield, you need a new chief of police.
And if the case was dismissed, it's almost certainly not the first time he failed to show up. No judge in this state is going to deny the Commonwealth a continuance if a witness doesn't show the first time it's scheduled for trial.

Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
Mike P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 12:59 PM   #5
Gloucester2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 833
Blog Entries: 1
Mike - I'm not a lawyer (but I fight with them all day ) but Doesn't "dismissed without prejudice" mean the charges can be refiled ?
Gloucester2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 03:19 PM   #6
Diamond Tackle
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Diamond Tackle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 869
"without prejudice" definitely means you leave the door open for possible future legal action. Ive signed many documets this way,
I paid an installment pmt to a contractor that way once, he knew exactly what it meant, and he finished the job properly after that.
Unlikely they will reopen the case however.

Diamond Tackle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 04:06 PM   #7
TC23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: East Bay RI
Posts: 47
"without prejudice" is a bone the judge threw the police chief to save him some face. Chief should be embarressed for failing to appear.
TC23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com