PHANTON BEACH ,,,,, OTW

[piemma]

Read the article on the plane home from Chi town last night. Great read without burning any spots. Kudos to Megan and OTW.

[Rappin Mikey]

Great issue. Couldn't put mine down last night. My wife kept asking me where Phantom Beach was. I explained it to her twice then she asked me again. OK, but how do you get there?

[Flaptail]

Glad you all liked it. I thought it was a great idea when they asked me. I would never have thought of it. The OTW Staff was right on the mark.

[TwitchellCreek]

I took one look and thought....Oh no, RI fishers are going to be ripped. Then I read it, realized that the beach was make believe, and liked the concept. What an idea, taking a mix of veteran surfmen and having them analyze the same terrain. I thought it was cool to find differences and similarities in their analysis. I must have flipped back and forth to see the map 100 times, as Flap and others were technical on wind direction and tides, I almost tore the map out, b/c I was tired of flipping.

I'm no bait soaker, but would still love to walk the jetty with a needle at night. I'd be a little concerned about lobster traps and markers, but would still try the jetty. After fanning the jetty (both sides), I would check the beach and structure just west. If it was crowded, I may take the walk just to see what others were up to. I'm most comfortable at night, and would bring an assortment of Needlefish in dark colors, some bucktails, and lead head w/ plastics.

Thanks OTW Zeno Flap Steve M and company, I'll be dreaming of Phantom beach tonight.

Excellent concept. Great Write. Great read.

[Offshore]

I thought the whole idea was great and well done by the magazine and the authors.

Now, does that mean no more site burning by OTW ?

[JoeP]

I agree - great article by all the authors. Just about the best read I've had from OTW in a long time.


Now, Megan's condescending, slightly arrogant, misguided, and misinformed Publisher's Editorial was ... forget it I'll keep my opinion to myself.

[Mr. Sandman]

Phantom Beach was a much better approach then the October cheat-sheet article. That kind of tell-all writing is best left to the supermarket tabloids. OTW is usually above that kind of stuff. Yes it sells (as noted by the record numbers) but (IMO) it is poor journalism and does not teach anyone much of anything. If selling more copies is what its all about, perhaps topless babes on the cover holding a big fish will get your numbers up.

[RIROCKHOUND]

Joe;
I was leaving that alone as well..
I really didnt appreciate being talked down to. I think a vast majorit of posts on this site regarding this topic was intelligent and valid. He singled out the few bad posts.

That being said I really enjoyed the insight from the 4 authors as to how they would approach the spots and what weather conditions, lures, tackle etc. It gives us more to think about in analyzling our own favorite spots.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Offshore

I thought the whole idea was great and well done by the magazine and the authors.

Now, does that mean no more site burning by OTW ?

If you think about it "spot" articles are easier than generic ones, no editorial coordination, they probably don't have to go far to find them.
One of my thoughts is an article with actual aerial photos of a sand beach from the previous season. How to fish it, maybe at a couple of different tide stages. Would the beach need to be identified and would'nt it change enough from winter storms to no longer be a spot article.
The same thing could be done with sand flats, esturarys, rocky points and reefs for the boat boys.