Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » The Scuppers

The Scuppers This is a new forum for the not necessarily fishing related topics...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-31-2005, 12:23 PM   #1
Skip N
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Skip N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seekonk
Posts: 1,796
Sad to hear Terry has died today. Or i guess i should say Terry was starved to death by the courts. I think its odd that the Far left in this country are more than happy to remove the feeding tube on this innocent women but they will be the first ones to be protesting to save someone like Scott Peterson who murdered his wife and child is put to death. The mentally of these people is down right scary and borderline insane. Kill the innocent and spare the murderors. Sick just sick. Prayers to Terry's family
Skip N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 12:41 PM   #2
PaulS
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
PaulS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
I guess you'd rather have had her euthanised? What's insane to me is that there are people who evidentially can't make a decision and would rather have the courts decide than leave it up to her husband to fufill her wishes. Her wishes were finally carried out - 7 years or so after her husband finally realized there was no hope for a recovery for her. He prob. should have done it sooner.
PaulS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 01:01 PM   #3
RIJIMMY
sick of bluefish
iTrader: (1)
 
RIJIMMY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 8,672
Paul, there was no indecision on Terri, her husband wanted her to die, her parents to live. The courts were involved to decide on who legally has the right to make the decision to end her life.
As far as the years it took to resolve this in court, put it in perspective. Scott Petersen will be in jail a minimun of 17 years before all appeals are exhausted. Taxpayers will spend tons of $ for court fees and living expenses for him. Is it wrong that that the decision to end an innocent life took so long? I'm glad I love in country that human life is valued enough to cause debate and attention from our legal system
This case raised a lot of questions, Im not sure where I stand on this.
Her husband was banging away at another woman while Terri's parents visited her everyday. Makes me not feel too much for the husband and side with the parents.
I've heard that Terri's mind is the equivalent of a 6 months old...is that such a bad thing? Was she happy? We'll never know. Sad story no matter what your views are.
RIJIMMY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 01:06 PM   #4
piemma
Very Grumpy bay man
iTrader: (0)
 
piemma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 10,887
Blog Entries: 2
There are no winners in this case. Terri lost 15 years ago. Her parents lost today. Her husband, I am not in a position to judge him. I have not been in his position and I hope to God I never am forced to make that decision for my wife.
Me, I just want a massive heart attack with a 50 on the end of my line.

No boat, back in the suds.
piemma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 01:16 PM   #5
PaulS
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
PaulS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
Her husband spent approx. 15 years carring for her and trying to carry out her wishes. While all of us would prob. like to believe we would remain faithfull to our spouses after 7 years of remaining faithfull to her, he finally, somewhat moved on (I guess "banging away at some woman" is one way of looking at it). The courts have found that the husband had legal standing to carry out her wishes (the bible also). What didn't the parents understand about that? After 3-4 times in front of a judge, you'd think they would understand. I read that the parents have a website which appeals for donations, the rift b/w the parents and the husband supposedly started around the time he recieved the insurance settlement and when the parents asked for a share of it.
PaulS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 01:47 PM   #6
RIJIMMY
sick of bluefish
iTrader: (1)
 
RIJIMMY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 8,672
The insurance settlement was suppposed to be used to keep her alive, he went back to court to be able to use the funds to fight to remove the tube.
From my understanding, there was no financial gain for teh parents in keeping their daughter alive.
as far as them "not understanding "the courts, good for them for contuning to fight for what they beleive in, thats the foundation of this country.
RIJIMMY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 02:04 PM   #7
PaulS
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
PaulS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
What was the source of the money to pay for her care all of these years - the insurance settlement. The husband used that money to also pay the lawyers to get her wishes carried out.

If I have to go, I'll take a stroke. A good lesson for everyone to have their wishes in writing.
PaulS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 02:07 PM   #8
Skip N
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Skip N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seekonk
Posts: 1,796
The husband didn't allow the parents to be with Terry during her last few minutes alive. Need we say anything else about this guy? I can't imagine what her parents were going through watching there daughter starve to death the last two weeks. Not aloud to give thier daugher water without feer of going to jail. Thats what really gets me the most. If ALL the family agreed that Terry wanted to die if put into this positon and that was her wish that is one thing. But in this case you have only one person saying this is what she wanted with NO possitive evedince to support it. I dont know how the hell the courts could rule in the husbands favor with NO evidince.
Skip N is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com