advance climate change by….destroying art? makes all kinds of sense

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I didn't know the paintings were protected, until the environmental terrorists started doing this. The fact that the art is protected, makes their actions MORE stupid, if that's even possible.

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

they’re attempting to destroy priceless art, unless we meet their political
demands. that’s a terrorist.

So you admit the painting was protected but you still believe that by throwing mashed pot. at the art they're attempting to destroy the art?

Seems like a contradictory statement.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So you admit the painting was protected but you still believe that by throwing mashed pot. at the art they're attempting to destroy the art?

Seems like a contradictory statement.

yes, i’m sure their intent was to destroy it. they’re not very bright, you see.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So you admit the painting was protected but you still believe that by throwing mashed pot. at the art they're attempting to destroy the art?

Seems like a contradictory statement.

not if they didn’t know the art was protected. the geniuses who threw tomato soup on a painting last week, yelled “what’s more important! life or art?”.

that suggests they believed they were destroying the art.

if they were rational, they’d be republicans.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

not if they didn’t know the art was protected. the geniuses who threw tomato soup on a painting last week, yelled “what’s more important! life or art?”.

that suggests they believed they were destroying the art. actually you are totally wrong as they said they knew they weren't destroying the art.

“I want to make one thing perfectly clear, we did no damage to the painting whatsoever,” Phoebe Plummer, a climate activist who, along with Anna Holland, threw the soup at the famous painting and then glued their hands to the gallery floor on October 14.

if they were rational, they’d be republicans. That is funny as the Rep. deny science and do nothing. Seems like they are smarter than most of the R party.

You can't help yourself?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

You can't help yourself?

"“I want to make one thing perfectly clear, we did no damage to the painting whatsoever,”

Which again Paul, tells us nothing about what they set out to do. Real MENSA candidates.

They're clueless idiots, that's all they are.

The wussification and dumbing-down of todays kids, is going to serve my kids quite nicely. My kids work their butts off and know how to take "no" for an answer sometimes. These kids will have no chance against my kids in the real world. None.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

"“I want to make one thing perfectly clear, we did no damage to the painting whatsoever,”

Which again Paul, tells us nothing about what they set out to do. Real MENSA candidates.

They're clueless idiots, that's all they are.

The wussification and dumbing-down of todays kids, is going to serve my kids quite nicely. My kids work their butts off and know how to take "no" for an answer sometimes. These kids will have no chance against my kids in the real world. None.

Now you sound like your father and grandfather and mine .. who i bet laughed when these kids tried to change the world... Jim like it or not these Kids have commitment .

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Now you sound like your father and grandfather

Well they said others can't compete because of their skin color, which is absurd because it says NOTHING. I say these kids can't compete because they're stupid, lazy, entitled, snowflakes, which is a lot more representative about future prospects, than skin color.

A liberal, saying it's wrong to judge people on skin color, that's a riot. It's all your side does.

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Well they said others can't compete because of their skin color, which is absurd because it says NOTHING. I say these kids can't compete because they're stupid, lazy, entitled, snowflakes, which is a lot more representative about future prospects, than skin color.

A liberal, saying it's wrong to judge people on skin color, that's a riot. It's all your side does.

What power you must have, to know all there is about a protester you've never met and if you answered honestly (doubtful), you know absolutely nothing about. There have been and always will be, hard working, very successful young and old participating in non-violent civil protests. You are a mirror of the rhetoric that comes out of the far right, judgement by action, skin color, age, race yada yada yada.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Jim like it or not these Kids have commitment .

protestors who set themselves on fire have commitment....

these are just clowns looking for attention....

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by scottw

protestors who set themselves on fire have commitment....

these are just clowns looking for attention....

that is true.
However the person who started this thread is the only clown looking for Attention ... with his daily fox outrage

Yet it's you guys who are yelling they are terrorist! trying to destroy Art with a can of soup and some superglue Hard Logic to argue with

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

"“I want to make one thing perfectly clear, we did no damage to the painting whatsoever,”

Which again Paul, tells us nothing about what they set out to do. Real MENSA candidates.

They're clueless idiots, that's all they are.

The wussification and dumbing-down of todays kids, is going to serve my kids quite nicely. My kids work their butts off and know how to take "no" for an answer sometimes. These kids will have no chance against my kids in the real world. None.

Not sure if you have been to a world class museum/gallery but you can see the glass in front of the paintings.

Totally agree it was stupid but they don't care about that. They want publicity - which they got. They prob. could care less about making $ and are more worried about saving the planet.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

They prob. could care less about making $ working, and are more worried about saving the planet.

Fixed it for you...