|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
06-23-2022, 01:11 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Neither is make up #^&#^&#^&#^&
It’s interesting that it’s called ‘originalism’ when the Second Amendment ORIGINALLY was interpreted entirely differently than it is now.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
so tell us why they made the wrong legal argument.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
06-23-2022, 01:39 PM
|
#2
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,449
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
so tell us why they made the wrong legal argument.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
You can feel free to read the dissent
SCOTUS is now a hard right-wing Federalist Society majority-Catholic court
with 3 or 4 of the Justices in the extremist Catholic sect Opus Dei.
So now, as I understand the Supreme Court, the government can arrest and jail you without Miranda rights, execute you even if your lawyer screws up, force you to have a baby, and use tax dollars to support religion.
But it can't protect your right to vote or keep you safe from guns.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
06-23-2022, 01:42 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
You can feel free to read the dissent
SCOTUS is now a hard right-wing Federalist Society majority-Catholic court
with 3 or 4 of the Justices in the extremist Catholic sect Opus Dei.
So now, as I understand the Supreme Court, the government can arrest and jail you without Miranda rights, execute you even if your lawyer screws up, force you to have a baby, and use tax dollars to support religion.
But it can't protect your right to vote or keep you safe from guns.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
sure i can read the dissent. i asked you.
do you can’t tell me why you think they made the wrong argument, you just know you’re supposed to side with the liberals.
The court has been liberal since Warren Burger was on it. elections have consequences.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
06-23-2022, 01:45 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
You can feel free to read the dissent
SCOTUS is now a hard right-wing Federalist Society majority-Catholic court
with 3 or 4 of the Justices in the extremist Catholic sect Opus Dei.
So now, as I understand the Supreme Court, the government can arrest and jail you without Miranda rights, execute you even if your lawyer screws up, force you to have a baby, and use tax dollars to support religion.
But it can't protect your right to vote or keep you safe from guns.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
the right to own guns is explicitly guaranteed. The right to kill your unborn baby was invented out of thin air by judges who thought it was their job to be activists.
Activists play a very important role. But they make terrible
judges. I guess you have no idea what the blindfold represents on every statue of lady justice in every courthouse in the country.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
06-23-2022, 01:58 PM
|
#5
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,449
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
the right to own guns is explicitly guaranteed. The right to kill your unborn baby was invented out of thin air by judges who thought it was their job to be activists.
Activists play a very important role. But they make terrible
judges. I guess you have no idea what the blindfold represents on every statue of lady justice in every courthouse in the country.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Actually activist judges have now interpreted this to mean citizens, not militia and overturned a hundred year old state law.
Generations of Supreme Court and academic opinion held that the amendment did not confer on individuals a right “to keep and bear Arms” but, rather, referred only to the privileges belonging to state militias. This was not a controversial view. The late Chief Justice Warren E. Burger said, in 1991, that the idea that the Second Amendment conferred a right for individuals to bear arms was “a fraud on the American public.” Burger was no liberal, and his view simply reflected the overwhelming consensus on the issue at the time.
But hopefully you’ll get the results you wished for.
Over 20,000 civilians have been killed by gun violence in the US in 2022 so far.
Compare that with 4,662 verified civilian war deaths in Ukraine.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 AM.
|
| |