Trump

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

The crime of conspiracy doesn’t require you to be present at the scene of the crime.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

that wasn't the question, if you read the indictment, surely you would know

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by scottw

that wasn't the question, if you read the indictment, surely you would know

Doesn’t matter, if all were present.
If you do read the indictment, you will see that not all of the conspirators were charged on all counts.

Do you think the DOJ prosecutors didn’t do the work to be able to obtain convictions?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

I read the indictment...interesting stuff....apparently 10 unarmed guys hoped to cross the delaware in a boat and take the capitol, Steal Team 1 and Steal Team 2 apparently entered the capitol unarmed and were going to take the capitol and hold it until the heavily armed back up units arrived(they apparently never arrived) where they would then overthrow democracy.....kinds like Chaz/Chop without the firepower

biggest question I have is if the FBI, which we know has closely monitoring these types since being declared domestic terrorists back during the Obama years, knew just about everything they were up to between the election and insurrection as well as all of the mayhem and violence they continued to plot afterward.....

why was there no added security at the capitol, how did these guys get anywhere near the capitol never mind in the capitol and why weren't they arrested until a year after the event?

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by scottw

I read the indictment...interesting stuff....apparently 10 unarmed guys hoped to cross the delaware in a boat and take the capitol, Steal Team 1 and Steal Team 2 apparently entered the capitol unarmed and were going to take the capitol and hold it until the heavily armed back up units arrived(they apparently never arrived) where they would then overthrow democracy.....kinds like Chaz/Chop without the firepower

biggest question I have is if the FBI, which we know has closely monitoring these types since being declared domestic terrorists back during the Obama years, knew just about everything they were up to between the election and insurrection as well as all of the mayhem and violence they continued to plot afterward.....

why was there no added security at the capitol, how did these guys get anywhere near the capitol never mind in the capitol and why weren't they arrested until a year after the event?

Sounds like questions for the administration in charge, Flynn’s brother, Chris Miller, etc.
Having all the former secretary’s of defense issue a statement should give you reason to wonder.

Oh yeah, the deep state

The ten living American secretaries of defense collectively signed an extraordinary letter over the weekend, stating in the strongest possible terms that the U.S. election is over, the time for protests is past, and that there is no role for the U.S. military in resolving any controversy surrounding it. They called for a smooth and professional transition of defense responsibilities from the current administration to the next, reflecting their frustration with the obvious stonewalling that has characterized much of the turnover so far. And, most forcefully, they said that any civilian and military officials who directed the use of the military to interfere in the electoral process would be held accountable, “including potentially facing criminal penalties, for the grave consequences of their actions on our republic.”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Sounds like questions for the administration in charge, Flynn’s brother, Chris Miller, etc.
Having all the former secretary’s of defense issue a statement should give you reason to wonder.

Oh yeah, the deep state

The ten living American secretaries of defense collectively signed an extraordinary letter over the weekend, stating in the strongest possible terms that the U.S. election is over, the time for protests is past, and that there is no role for the U.S. military in resolving any controversy surrounding it. They called for a smooth and professional transition of defense responsibilities from the current administration to the next, reflecting their frustration with the obvious stonewalling that has characterized much of the turnover so far. And, most forcefully, they said that any civilian and military officials who directed the use of the military to interfere in the electoral process would be held accountable, “including potentially facing criminal penalties, for the grave consequences of their actions on our republic.”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you ramble a lot.....

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Flynn’s brother

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I played baseball and football with him...I'll ask...