Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I listened to almost all of the oral arguments and was utterly effing dismayed by what I heard from the conservative justices who pretty much unilaterally flip flopped from the positions on precedent they testified to during their confirmation hearings.
This ruling has the potential to invalidate the credibility of the Supreme Court.
|
was it wrong when judges reversed precedent on slavery and segregation? where do people
get the idea that once there’s a precedent, that it’s carved in stone?
every line real argument i’ve heard this week, has to do with how intrusive it would be to moms if restrictions are implemented. the supreme court doesn’t care about that. they only care about whether or not it’s constitutional.
i don’t deny that any restrictions would be burdensome on women. but if you think on the court is supposed to decide cases based on what makes life easier for who, you need to take a civics class.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Threaded Mode