Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
Are you claiming that 17 year old Rittenhouse was the only person there who had agency and responsibility for his actions? That he didn't belong there? That he had no reason to react to the riots. And that all the rioters had the sole right and reason to be there because it was a riot and they were the rioters? And why the hell should anybody but a rioter have any reason or cause to be there? That the rioters did not need to justify their presence at the riot nor be required to explain why they brought weapons because they were the rioters and so obviously they need not explain their presence nor have to assume any responsibility for their actions? That because they were the justified rioters, not the "other," that it was Rittenhouse's fault because he is the "other" party.
You're full of some insane crap.
|
well yes....rittenhouse is the ONLY person that should not have been there....everything else that was going on that night was perfectly fine and normal....if rittenhouse had not been there his attackers would not have been triggered to attack him and so it is rittenhouse's fault that they are dead...if he had not been armed he might be dead...and that would be his own fault as well, for being there, despite not breaking any laws
this is the nonsense pete and spence are clinging to...it is truly insane
Threaded Mode