Rittenhouse was legally in possession of that rifle

[Pete F.]

Matt Gaetz wants to hire Kyle Rittenhouse as a congressional intern.
I'm pretty sure that Matt Gaetz is looking for a wingman to find teenage girls, not an intern.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Matt Gaetz wants to hire Kyle Rittenhouse as a congressional intern.
I'm pretty sure that Matt Gaetz is looking for a wingman to find teenage girls, not an intern.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Not that it matters much to me, but I hope you're not as nasty outside this forum as you are in it.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Matt Gaetz wants to hire Kyle Rittenhouse as a congressional intern.

He’s got competition with his douchebag in crime Gosar.

It’s pretty sickening, kid obtains a firearm illegally, uses it in display of mind-bending reckless manner, kills people and they want to celebrate him as a hero. Just because he was acquitted of federal charges doesn’t mean he’s not a lessen for what wrong looks like.

Looks like civil charges are likely.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

He’s got competition with his douchebag in crime Gosar.

It’s pretty sickening, kid obtains a firearm illegally, uses it in display of mind-bending reckless manner, kills people and they want to celebrate him as a hero. Just because he was acquitted of federal charges doesn’t mean he’s not a lessen for what wrong looks like.

Looks like civil charges are likely.

you talking about rittenhouse? that’s so off, it’s hard to tell? what federal charges? what laws were broken to obtain the firearm?

he’s no hero. but he is a victim of your sides deranged slander cartel, and he’s going to be win a ton in defamation suits. but you say no, and obviously you know
more than alan dershowitz on the subject of tort law. you’re never stupidly wrong

if you’re not talking about rittenhouse, and again your points were so wrong on the rittenhouse facts you may not have been, i apologize

if you were talking about rittenhouse TDF was correct to ask if you are the dictionary definition of wrong.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you talking about rittenhouse? that’s so off, it’s hard to tell? what federal charges? what laws were broken to obtain the firearm?

Meant felony charges. His firearm was purchased through a straw man because he wasn’t old enough at the time. I believe that trial begins soon and his buddy may be in deep do do.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Meant felony charges. His firearm was purchased through a straw man because he wasn’t old enough at the time. I believe that trial begins soon and his buddy may be in deep do do.

Grabbing at straws
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Just because he was acquitted of federal charges doesn’t mean he’s not a lessen for what wrong looks like.

Your posts are what wrong looks like
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

Your posts are what wrong looks like
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

rittenhouse is going to have to build a bank to put the proceeds from his libel suits. they wanted to win a presidential
we too. so badly, they were going to smear this kid to the point where it jeopardizes his entire life. and they’re going to answer for it this time.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

rittenhouse is going to have to build a bank to put the proceeds from his libel suits. they wanted to win a presidential
we too. so badly, they were going to smear this kid to the point where it jeopardizes his entire life. and they’re going to answer for it this time.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Who is he going to sue for libel???

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Who is he going to sue for libel???

everyone who called him a white supremacist, everyone who said he illegally transported a rifle across state lines, anyone who spewed lies that were knowable as lies. that’s the standard. it’s not a good situation for
msnbc and cnn to be in.

i’m sure you doubted Sandmann would get anything. because to you, liberals cannot be wrong. what they did to this kid was way way way worse. they tried to deny him a life, so that they could beat trump. f-ck them.

republicans have had enough. lawyers will be lined up
to represent him for fee in the suits that are coming.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

everyone who called him a white supremacist, everyone who said he illegally transported a rifle across state lines, anyone who spewed lies that were knowable as lies. that’s the standard. it’s not a good situation for
msnbc and cnn to be in.

He’s going to get nothing aside from maybe a civil conviction on lesser charges.