Rittenhouse trial

[Got Stripers]

You fu*ck heads can spin it any which way, let’s ask a question I know none of you will answer honestly. If he was your son and you go visit him in lockup are you telling him your damn proud of him or asking him what the fu*ck were you thinking? He shouldn’t have crossed state lines carrying illegally and DeBarrs fu*cked assumption he is there somehow to help the business owners is complete BS.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

You fu*ck heads can spin it any which way, let’s ask a question I know none of you will answer honestly. If he was your son and you go visit him in lockup are you telling him your damn proud of him or asking him what the fu*ck were you thinking? He shouldn’t have crossed state lines carrying illegally and DeBarrs fu*cked assumption he is there somehow to help the business owners is complete BS.

I assume you were referring to me (DeBarr--I like the way you made a prefix out of De--kind of like a classy French name). You seem a bit unhinged here, so that might explaina why you claim I had a "fu*cked up assumption" that I never said.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

You fu*ck heads can spin it any which way, let’s ask a question I know none of you will answer honestly. If he was your son and you go visit him in lockup are you telling him your damn proud of him or asking him what the fu*ck were you thinking? He shouldn’t have crossed state lines carrying illegally and DeBarrs fu*cked assumption he is there somehow to help the business owners is complete BS.

you asked, i’ll answer. if he was my son, i’d want to strangle him
when i picked him up. i’d ask him how he could have been so unbelievably stupid and reckless.

unfortunately for you and the rest of your liberal ilk, even stupid and reckless people
have the right to self defense.

the guy who survived, pointed a gun at Rittenhouses head from a few feet away. how is that not obvious self defense?

violent riots are not a good idea. they increase the likelihood of violent confrontations.


you asked a question, i answered. did you answer my question about what property owners are supposed to do in that situation ? i am stunned they don’t open fire with belt fed machine guns in that situation. i’m supposed to to go on welfare because of a bunch of feral, sociopathic morons who are mad at something i had nothing to do with? and because the cops i am paying with my taxes, are being told by cowardly elected officials not to confront and put down the rioters?

Yeah we’re the f*ckheads here.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

You fu*ck heads can spin it any which way,

DeBarrs fu*cked assumption he is there somehow to help the business owners is complete BS.

^^^^someone has issues.....

and, isn't it reported, and I think it was confirmed by politifact that the kid was actually thanked by police for being there and given water by them?

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by scottw

^^^^someone has issues.....

and, isn't it reported, and I think it was confirmed by politifact that the kid was actually thanked by police for being there and given water by them?

It has been
How wonderful is that, a 17 year old kid illegally carrying a firearm and the cops don’t even question it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

It has been
How wonderful is that, a 17 year old kid illegally carrying a firearm and the cops don’t even question it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

he apparently wasn't threatening anyone

[scottw]

unlike the peaceful protestor people burning the place down...

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by scottw

he apparently wasn't threatening anyone

So, two wrongs now make a right
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

So, two wrongs now make a right
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

didn't say that...but carrying a gun doesn't negate your right to self defense

NOV 12

The judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial on Friday said he'll instruct the jury that unless the state proved the teen's AR-15-style rifle had an unlawfully short barrel, he can't be convicted of being a minor in possession of a firearm.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

didn't say that...but carrying a gun doesn't negate your right to self defense

NOV 12

The judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial on Friday said he'll instruct the jury that unless the state proved the teen's AR-15-style rifle had an unlawfully short barrel, he can't be convicted of being a minor in possession of a firearm.

i’ve been wondering about this, everyone in the left is saying his possession of that rifle was a crime, i have no idea what the lawns there. it just can’t be that they jumped to conclusions, can it?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Raider Ronnie]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

It has been
How wonderful is that, a 17 year old kid illegally carrying a firearm and the cops don’t even question it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Your liberal head is going to explode when this kid is exonerated then sues for defamation & is awarded 10 of millions !

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Raider Ronnie

Your liberal head is going to explode when this kid is exonerated then sues for defamation & is awarded 10 of millions !

for his libel suits, his lawyer is Lin Wood, who represented Richard Jewel and the Covington kid.

how will the liberal riots be, I wonder, if he’s not convicted?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

for his libel suits, his lawyer is Lin Wood, who represented Richard Jewel and the Covington kid.

how will the liberal riots be, I wonder, if he’s not convicted?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

there will be riots and the usual suspects here will justify them.....

[Raider Ronnie]

Originally Posted by scottw

there will be riots and the usual suspects here will justify them.....

The National Guard has been called in ahead of the verdict.
Where the #^&#^&#^&#^& were they during the riots ???
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device