Feinstein’s opening statement in Barrett hearings

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

As I said a month ago
Congress needs to pass laws and make them non reviewable, preferably sunsetted.
Then SCOTUS would not be legislating from the bench like some think they did in New Haven and some don’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

youre saying the laws congress passed should
not be subject to judicial review? so how are we protected if they overreach in violation of the constitution?

i like the checks and balances, just wish it was a lot less political.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in

i like the checks and balances, just wish it was a lot less political.
[size=1

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device[/size]

Maybe you should tell that to sue happy Republicans

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Maybe you should tell that to sue happy Republicans

except republicans are generally in favor of tort reform (to reduce frivolous lawsuits), and democrats are generally opposed to tort reform.

My god, you can't get one right on this thread even by accident.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

except republicans are generally in favor of tort reform (to reduce frivolous lawsuits), and democrats are generally opposed to tort reform.

My god, you can't get one right on this thread even by accident.

ok jim whos filing all the election law suits nation wide your a just a partisan hack you live in an alternative universe

tort has nothing to do with the supreme court but there you go again comparing apples to oranges but every one else has it wrong