sources say trumps choice is Amy Barrett

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Jim keeps dodging what a large number of sentors said on the floor and on record. And he conflating it with past events which have no connections or relevance to the current issue At hand , That no POTUS should appoint a justice prior to an election.?.

He uses word .like hypocrisy.?. No its much more than that its lying its proof that what was done to Garland was a lie and the reasons was to remove power from the people and insert there choice , and doing it again .. and they excuse it away as its not illegal, neither are abortions yet

But a moral and ethical objection against lying sentors don't get votes so we'll make excuses

But moral and ethical objections against abortions well thats different and it an issue that

But Between 2006 and 2015, the American abortion rate declined 26 percent to the lowest level on record,
The biggest reason for the drop, experts say, isn’t tougher abortion laws — it’s better access to contraception.

But they keep beating a drum to an issue... to us a phrase from Tumps covid wisdom IT BASICALLY AFFECTS NO ONE.





Conservatism is now Transactional , respect for laws and the constitution are just sales pitches

how didn’t dodge? i said they were hypocrites?

no you please address biden’s hypocrisy on this issue? he said when bush was president, that president’s should not make S.C. nominations in an election year. in 2016 he flip flopped. now he’s flip flopping again. he’s had three different opinions in making nominations close to an election, depending on who was in power.

so go ahead, address that as directly as i did. but you won’t. you can’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

how didn’t dodge? i said they were hypocrites?

no you please address biden’s hypocrisy on this issue? he said when bush was president, that president’s should not make S.C. nominations in an election year. in 2016 he flip flopped. now he’s flip flopping again. he’s had three different opinions in making nominations close to an election, depending on who was in power.

so go ahead, address that as directly as i did. but you won’t. you can’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

there you go again conflating what republicans actually said and what they are doing now and some how inserting Biden as an explanation

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

there you go again conflating what republicans actually said and what they are doing now and some how inserting Biden as an explanation

I'm not using Biden as an explanation. I'm using Bidens identical hypocrisy, which you won't even call hypocrisy, as evidence that you have no consistent standards on the issue.

WDMSO: the republicans are being hypocrites.

Jim: I agree. But why didn't you care when Biden exhibited the same exact hypocrisy?

WDMAO: Youre using Biden as an explanation (followed by emojis).

Id be interested to know, truly, if you don't see your double standard here, or are you just trying to dodge it. I have no idea which it is.

Anyway, what's good for the goose and all that. If democrats can do whatever suits them when they are in power, you cannot ask republicans not to do the same thing.

Prediction: she gets confirmed, and in November, the democrats run the whole show in DC, like they did in 2009. So you won't have to throw a temper tantrum for too long.

Emojis don't help a weak argument, I'm afraid.