added credibility to Bidens accuser?

[Jim in CT]

[QUOTE=PaulS;1192588]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Prove he didn't please.

So the burden if proof isn't on you when you make that claim? You can just say he knew, and that's good enough? And there IS proof he didn't know. Not sure how many times I have to say it, but there is actual video of Trump previously using the same exact gestures to mock someone else, who was healthy. So the fact is, he uses those gestures regardless of the medical situation of the person he's mocking.

Paul, lick your wounds and go away. You're having a very, very rough time on this thread.

[PaulS]

[QUOTE=Jim in CT;1192589]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So the burden if proof isn't on you when you make that claim?when you mock someone with a physical aliment in the same manner as that aliment manifests itself, the burden of proof is on the person who did the mocking to prove it is a coincidence. You can just say he knew, and that's good enough? And there IS proof he didn't know. Not sure how many times I have to say it, but there is actual video of Trump previously using the same exact gestures to mock someone else, who was healthy. So the fact is, he uses those gestures regardless of the medical situation of the person he's mocking.

Paul, lick your wounds and go away. You're having a very, very rough time on this thread.

So it is just a coincidence that he physically mocked someone that has some disability that manifest itself in the reporter have those same type of physical movements? BC 1 other time (which I haven't seen) he mocked someone else in that fashion, you think that proves he didn't do it intentionally.

You're naïve or intentionally lying. You have been defending him for how many pages - that is exactly what TDS is. If the person discussing things with you wants to go on and on for pages and pages you will continue to defend Trump bc you have TDS.

[Jim in CT]

[QUOTE=PaulS;1192590]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

So it is just a coincidence that he physically mocked someone that has some disability that manifest itself in the reporter have those same type of physical movements? BC 1 other time (which I haven't seen) he mocked someone else in that fashion, you think that proves he didn't do it intentionally.

You're naïve or intentionally lying. You have been defending him for how many pages - that is exactly what TDS is. If the person discussing things with you wants to go on and on for pages and pages you will continue to defend Trump bc you have TDS.

Paul, you are criticizing him for "making fun of retards" when in your own words, you never saw him do it. You are criticizing him for something which you admit he has never done.

This is the most vulgar, obnoxious, jerky POTUS we have ever had. And all the legitimate things available to criticize him for, aren't enough, You have to make stuff up. You ADMIT that you made it up.

And that, my friend, is what TDS is.

[PaulS]

[QUOTE=Jim in CT;1192591]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Paul, you are criticizing him for "making fun of retards" when in your own words, you never saw him do it. You are criticizing him for something which you admit he has never done.

This is the most vulgar, obnoxious, jerky POTUS we have ever had. And all the legitimate things available to criticize him for, aren't enough, You have to make stuff up. You ADMIT that you made it up.

And that, my friend, is what TDS is.

I didn't make anything up - he mocked the guy and you are defending him. You're trying to defend the indefensible (TDS)

You're trying to waive it away by saying he made the same motions before 1 time while ignoring the hundreds (thousands) of times he insulted others w/o making that motion. If you had 000s of data points in an actuarial review and one outlier, you would ignore the outlier - not the 000s of data points. I just read the other times that Trump waived his arms around like that the contortions where not the same and the arms movements, spasms and contortions where totally different (mocking the reporters curl of the right hand and wrist). Ann Coulter wrote in her book that Trump was not making fun of the reporter but rather "was dong a standard retard, waving his arms and sounding stupid". In addition, before the mocking, Trump said "You've got to see this guy". The reporter previously covered him and said they were on a first name basis.

[Jim in CT]

[QUOTE=PaulS;1192593]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I didn't make anything up -

oh FFS you said he made fun of retards, i asked for an
example, you said the reporter who got said has no intellectual
issues.

there is no evidence, none, that he “made fun of regards.”. ann coulter’s opinion means nothing.

show me where he “made fun of regards”. if you can’t show me anything, that means you made it up.

what in god’s name happened to your brain?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Nebe]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

oh FFS you said he made fun of retards, i asked for an
example, you said the reporter who got said has no intellectual
issues.

there is no evidence, none, that he “made fun of regards.”. ann coulter’s opinion means nothing.

show me where he “made fun of regards”. if you can’t show me anything, that means you made it up.

what in god’s name happened to your brain?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I send my regards to your brain as well.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Nebe

I send my regards to your brain as well.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

On this thread, Paul used the word "retard" for absolutely no conceivable reason.

He accused Trump of mocking those people, and when I asked for examples, he came up with Trump mocking a guy who has no intellectual issues. He admitted Trump hasn't made fun of those people, but he thinks he's capable of it, therefore that's the same as if he actually did it.

As wrong as Paul claims it would be to make fun of such people, he defended Obama doing exactly that, because Obama was making fun of himself at the same time (as if that's an excuse for using hate speech).

Paul claimed he didn't tattle to the mods, but rather, he alerted them to the behavior of others which he thinks violated the rules. Because that's so much different from "tattling".

He calls me a Trumplican even though several times I criticized Trump harshly.

And finally, he (like the rest of you) can't concede that liberals are holding Biden's accuser to a very different standard than they help Kavanaugh's accuser to.

When I act that irrationally, you let me know, and I'll go get a cat scan.