Trump* pulls Brady from Super Bowl

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Trump would be well served to let scientists come up with the innovative solutions, not just make ridiculous crap up in desperation because you’ve lost most all control of the issue.


Says who?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

the national
library of
medicine.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04343742

if they thought it was worth studying, please tell me why it’s so bad for trump to ask if it’s a possibility.

have fun with that.

we should leave the science to scientists. why can’t someone ask if there a way to use a chemical
known to kill the virus, to treat those with the virus? why is that such a stupid thing to ask?

because orange man bad.

if radioactive material can be modified to be more beneficial than harmful, you’re saying it’s stupid to assume that the ingredients of Lysol can? Lysol is more lethal than radioactive material?

you’re not holding any cards here.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

the national
library of
medicine.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04343742

if they thought it was worth studying, please tell me why it’s so bad for trump to ask if it’s a possibility.

have fun with that.

we should leave the science to scientists. why can’t someone ask if there a way to use a chemical
known to kill the virus, to treat those with the virus? why is that such a stupid thing to ask?

because orange man bad.

if radioactive material can be modified to be more beneficial than harmful, you’re saying it’s stupid to assume that the ingredients of Lysol can? Lysol is more lethal than radioactive material?

you’re not holding any cards here.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim, you know I don’t like to stoop to insults but once again your reading comprehension is really lacking.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Jim, you know I don’t like to stoop to insults but once again your reading comprehension is really lacking.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The use of light is also already being looked into. But Trump is wrong for asking about it.

https://irdirect.net/prviewer/releas...4mmXZ__ticzLeU

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Jim, you know I don’t like to stoop to insults but once again your reading comprehension is really lacking.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

To be honest with you, I've had enough of insults. So if instead of saying I'm wrong, could you maybe give a specific example? I am as capable as ANYONE of being wrong, and there have been times on this board where you showed me I was wrong, and you did so with support, and I agreed with you that I was wrong. But saying I'm wrong, or that I can't read, is a tad vague as I'm sure you'd agree. So if you can forgo the vague charges of being illiterate and tell me exactly what I got wrong, I will also try to raise the bar here. Any chance we can do that?

the link I posted, says the CDC is looking at the use of chlorine dioxide. I assume that chlorine dioxide includes chlorine (I could be wrong as I hated chemistry), but if it does, chlorine is also a disinfectant that can be lethal (or are you saying that statement is wrong?)