What the Epoch Times forgets to mention

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

"And you continue to defend him "

In this thread, I said I can't stand his style. And in hindsight, obviously he should have done more. However, it's a naked re-writing of very recent history, to claim there was any kind of consensus then, that he should have gone much further. Your ilk called him a dictator for doing the one thing he did! Go back and read what Pelosi, Biden, Schumer, and all the news sites where you get you facts, had to say in January. The consensus was that it wasn't a big deal.

big deal not defending his style. Pat yourself self on the back for that if you want. You and your ilk must have got really tingly when he stood on the stage and made fun of retards and spazzes. Did you feel a little tingle when he did that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

You and your ilk

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I love when Paul gets a new word or phrase and then uses it repeatedly.....

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

I love when Paul gets a new word or phrase and then uses it repeatedly.....

Sorry, I already had that word in my vocabulary as it has been used here repeatedly. I just decided to lower myself to Jim's level and insult him with the same type of insults he throws out around here. Given your constant review of anyone's posts who doesn't bow down to Trump's failings to try to find a typo or think of something snarky to say, I would have thought you would know that

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I just decided to lower myself to Jim's level and insult him with the same type of insults he throws out around here.

this is childish

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Sorry, I already had that word in my vocabulary as it has been used here repeatedly. I just decided to lower myself to Jim's level and insult him with the same type of insults he throws out around here. Given your constant review of anyone's posts who doesn't bow down to Trump's failings to try to find a typo or think of something snarky to say, I would have thought you would know that

Here's a question, with zero insults...how do you happen to know what briefings Pelosi and Diblasio have had? Doesn't it make sense that the mayor of New York City (of all places) would be told everything he needs to know during a pandemic, so that he can make wise public policy decisions?

Wait, now I know what happened...Trump knew in January that it was bad. But he lied to Pelosi and Diblasio, because he wanted them to tell their constituents (all of whom vote democrat) to keep going out in public, in the hope that everyone in San Francisco and New York City would die before the election. That must be it.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Here's a question, with zero insults...how do you happen to know what briefings Pelosi and Diblasio have had? Doesn't it make sense that the mayor of New York City (of all places) would be told everything he needs to know during a pandemic, so that he can make wise public policy decisions?

Wait, now I know what happened...Trump knew in January that it was bad. But he lied to Pelosi and Diblasio, because he wanted them to tell their constituents (all of whom vote democrat) to keep going out in public, in the hope that everyone in San Francisco and New York City would die before the election. That must be it.

Do you have any proof they were in the briefings w/Trump or given briefings with the same type of info? Did Navarro call Pelosi or diblasio after he briefed Trump - or did Trump say "let's go brief Pelosi as I want her to have the same type of info. I had"?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Do you have any proof they were in the briefings w/Trump or given briefings with the same type of info? Did Navarro call Pelosi or diblasio after he briefed Trump - or did Trump say "let's go brief Pelosi as I want her to have the same type of info. I had"?

By what conceivable logic would you assume that the mayor of New York City was kept in the dark about a pandemic?

ANSWER: the logic which is based on the notion that everything bad is 100% Trumps fault.

Think for a minute about the assumptions you are making. Trump should have known in January that we needed a lockdown, but the speaker of the house and the mayor of NYC didn't know that in late February? That's plausible to you?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

By what conceivable logic would you assume that the mayor of New York City was kept in the dark about a pandemic?

more highly educated logic...or something...supposedly

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

By what conceivable logic would you assume that the mayor of New York City was kept in the dark about a pandemic?

ANSWER: the logic which is based on the notion that everything bad is 100% Trumps fault.

Think for a minute about the assumptions you are making. Trump should have known in January that we needed a lockdown, but the speaker of the house and the mayor of NYC didn't know that in late February? That's plausible to you?

And you fail to note Trump's long history of failing to inform anyone (or exclude them from info)who doesn't agree with him politically on things that matter.