The writing has been on the wall for years

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

no kidding....aren't these some of the same people that call other people "petty"


everybody drink ......

I think some of them were the same people who noticed your constant snarkyness.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I think some of them were the same people who noticed your constant snarkyness.

spelling it wrong doesn't get you credit for a new word in your limited vocabulary

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

spelling it wrong doesn't get you credit for a new word in your limited vocabulary

Pointing out typos just shows how petty people are and reinforces their snarkyness.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Pointing out typos just shows how petty people are and reinforces their snarkyness.

ok.....

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by scottw

spelling it wrong doesn't get you credit for a new word in your limited vocabulary

Unintelligent
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

your constant snarkyness.

you started with the name calling again after you said you wouldn't...soooo

[scottw]

sounds like biden likes lizzy for vp...that would be fabulous...

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

sounds like biden likes lizzy for vp...that would be fabulous...

That would go a long way towards satisfying the progressive wing of that party. A long way. He can't pick a moderate (not that there truly are any). He might need to throw a bone to the Bernie supporters.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

That would go a long way towards satisfying the progressive wing of that party. A long way. He can't pick a moderate (not that there truly are any). He might need to throw a bone to the Bernie supporters.

If he picks Warren hes a fool , the right hopes he does but honestly she did so poorly in the primarys there is no benfit ... now if he picked the burn. That would be different
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

If he picks Warren hes a fool , the right hopes he does but honestly she did so poorly in the primarys there is no benfit ... now if he picked the burn. That would be different
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

'there is no benfit "

Yes, there is enormous political benefit. Selecting her would please two key groups on the left - women and progressives.

You have it exactly backwards. As a Republican, I hope he selects Bernie. No ticket with Bernie on it, has any chance in any general election. He wants a revolution, and people between the coasts ain't asking for a revolution.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

'there is no benfit "

Yes, there is enormous political benefit. Selecting her would please two key groups on the left - women and progressives.

You have it exactly backwards. As a Republican, I hope he selects Bernie. No ticket with Bernie on it, has any chance in any general election. He wants a revolution, and people between the coasts ain't asking for a revolution.

Guess you didn't pay attention to the primaries

People hate Warren on equal footing with Hillary

Swing voters wouldn't see sanders as a socialist threat as VP. The right would of course use this angle ...


But I dont see the biden thinking about sanders and Sanders thinking about VP

So there's nothing to argue

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

you started with the name calling again after you said you wouldn't...soooo

Your post was directed at me. We all recognize it. I said I would only respond. Which I did.

SD agreed to stop calling people names. He can't help himself.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Your post was directed at me.

was it??...you shouldn't make everything about you... and try not to become triggered so easily...like teasing a kitten with a string

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

was it??...you shouldn't make everything about you... and try not to become triggered so easily...like teasing a kitten with a string

Yes, I am sure it was.

I'm not triggered. I just see no reason to take your snarkyness.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Yes, I am sure it was.

I'm not triggered. I just see no reason to take your snarkyness.

Yet when I choose not to take someone else's snarkyness, you say I'm angry. It must be very convenient to enjoy a benefit that you deny to others.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Yet when I choose not to take someone else's snarkyness, you say I'm angry. It must be very convenient to enjoy a benefit that you deny to others.

The difference is that you start it with your posts. I don't.