|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
02-08-2020, 05:23 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Marshfield, MA
Posts: 1,751
|
So why not eliminate the bluefish entries also??
The bluefish have been in even more of a decline cycle than bass. But the whole mystique of the bass is higher than bluefish for some reason.
Make it a bsb and scup event.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-09-2020, 07:33 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 258
|
Maybe you should just be allowed to keep a fish 28" to 34" over 48" and or 50 lbs (you would have to carry a Boga If you are trophy hunting) It would be made clear that the fish must weigh 50 or more pounds at any point it is in your possession, that eliminates "It was 50 when I caught it" scenario. It makes the holy grail of fishing attainable and protects the other 99.9% of breeders that are 15 to 49 pounds. Keeps tournaments alive and makes the charter captains happy. Personally I believe boats should not be allowed a trophy fish because it is rather easy to break 50 from a boat, no disrespect intended to anyone. From the surf it is an entirely different scenario, even at the canal. People will find a way to mount a 50 if they stick it and want to keep it. Maybe make the boat limit 60lbs and that would even things up with the shore guys somewhat.
Last edited by Headhunter; 02-09-2020 at 07:49 AM..
|
|
|
|
02-09-2020, 08:23 AM
|
#3
|
Very Grumpy bay man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 10,876
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Headhunter
Maybe you should just be allowed to keep a fish 28" to 34" over 48" and or 50 lbs (you would have to carry a Boga If you are trophy hunting) It would be made clear that the fish must weigh 50 or more pounds at any point it is in your possession, that eliminates "It was 50 when I caught it" scenario. It makes the holy grail of fishing attainable and protects the other 99.9% of breeders that are 15 to 49 pounds. Keeps tournaments alive and makes the charter captains happy. Personally I believe boats should not be allowed a trophy fish because it is rather easy to break 50 from a boat, no disrespect intended to anyone. From the surf it is an entirely different scenario, even at the canal. People will find a way to mount a 50 if they stick it and want to keep it. Maybe make the boat limit 60lbs and that would even things up with the shore guys somewhat.
|
Just makes too much sense...
.  
|
No boat, back in the suds. 
|
|
|
02-09-2020, 12:24 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Warwick RI,02889
Posts: 11,794
|
hEADHunter /WTF are you trying to put me back in treatment
50# rather easy by boat 
|
ENJOY WHAT YOU HAVE !!!
MIKE
|
|
|
02-09-2020, 12:56 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cumberland, RI
Posts: 2,266
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clammer
hEADHunter /WTF are you trying to put me back in treatment
50# rather easy by boat 
|
It's simple mike... you know that. Remember all those 50's we've caught!!!
WTF
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement -- Keith Benning
|
|
|
02-10-2020, 08:00 AM
|
#6
|
All up in the Interweb!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the dog house.
Posts: 5,209
|
If one really thinks about why the Derby committee eliminated striped bass as an eligible species, it might not sound as honorable as some (myself initially) were making it out to be. It was already known prior to last week's ASMFC meeting that MA did not submit any conservation equivalency measures which meant going into Tuesday's meeting they only had one option: 28 - >35 slot. Did the Derby committee "do the right thing" by eliminating striped bass or did they make an announcement that was almost inevitable being that no one will be able to keep a fish over 35 inches in Massachusetts beginning this year...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Headhunter
Maybe you should just be allowed to keep a fish 28" to 34" over 48" and or 50 lbs (you would have to carry a Boga If you are trophy hunting)
|
I had a conversation with one of the ASMFC reps and asked about a trophy tag. Essentially there are two problems with such an option. First off, by giving a trophy tag, which would result in additional harvest, you need to make it up elsewhere meaning a smaller slot range, for example. Second, calculating how much harvest would need to be reduced elsewhere with the tag is very difficult. Supposedly it was discussed between the reps but was quickly shot down.
|
Co-Host of The Surfcast Podcast
"Out there in the surf is where it's at, that's where the line gets drawn in the sand between those who talk fishing and those who live it."
- a wise man.
One good fish, a sharpie does not make...
Certified rock hopping billy goat.
|
|
|
02-10-2020, 02:02 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlapinski
If one really thinks about why the Derby committee eliminated striped bass as an eligible species, it might not sound as honorable as some (myself initially) were making it out to be. It was already known prior to last week's ASMFC meeting that MA did not submit any conservation equivalency measures which meant going into Tuesday's meeting they only had one option: 28 - >35 slot. Did the Derby committee "do the right thing" by eliminating striped bass or did they make an announcement that was almost inevitable being that no one will be able to keep a fish over 35 inches in Massachusetts beginning this year... 
|
My initial thought was that their hand was forced.
|
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 AM.
|
| |