House to vote on impeachment

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

gibberish.

there’s zero evidence, zero, that jordan knew what was happening. but he’s conservative, so an allegation is enough for
you to convict.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

How did I know you were going to land on were picking on him cuz hes a Republican

Just pointing out you dont need to see or witness wrong doings to have an idea somethings not right... in ohio or the whitehouse
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

How did I know you were going to land on were picking on him cuz hes a Republican

Just pointing out you dont need to see or witness wrong doings to have an idea somethings not right... in ohio or the whitehouse
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

so we’ll impeach him, because a disgruntled former
employee with blatant inconsistencies in her testimony, “has an idea” somethings not right. That’s what you’re saying now?

let’s use a wee-jee board ( no idea how to spell it) to
see if he gets impeached or not. you want to nullify a fair and free national election, because his actions don't feel right to someone he fired...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

let’s use a wee-jee board ( no idea how to spell it)
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Ouija
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Ouija
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

seriously?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

seriously?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yep

[scottw]

if he had a Ouija board he could ask it how to spell Ouija

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

so we’ll impeach him, because a disgruntled former
employee with blatant inconsistencies in her testimony, “has an idea” somethings not right. That’s what you’re saying now?

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You’re repeating lies again, just like your hero Floridaman
Pompeo knew 100 percent that the Yovanovitch removal was all a setup. We know that because, when Senator Bob Menendez asked Pompeo’s deputy secretary of state, John Sullivan, about Yovanovitch — at Sullivan’s Senate confirmation hearing on Oct. 30 to become the next U.S. ambassador to Moscow — he stated that she had served “admirably and capably.” When Menendez asked Sullivan whether Giuliani was behind her removal, Sullivan baldly declared that Giuliani was “seeking to smear Ambassador Yovanovitch, or have her removed. I believed he was, yes.”

Those were the words of Pompeo’s own deputy!

But they’ve never come out of Pompeo’s mouth. Though he reportedly argued privately to the President to keep Yovanovitch in place, Pompeo faithfully executed Trump’s order without uttering a word to defend his ambassador’s reputation in public. Would you want that #^&#^&#^&#^& as your commanding officer or leader of the State Department? He’s as slimy as they come.
Nobody left in Floridaman’s administration has a spine
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

so we’ll impeach him, because a disgruntled former
employee with blatant inconsistencies in her testimony, “has an idea” somethings not right. That’s what you’re saying now?

let’s use a wee-jee board ( no idea how to spell it) to
see if he gets impeached or not. you want to nullify a fair and free national election, because his actions don't feel right to someone he fired...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Keep ignoring what competent people have all testified to..

And keep ignoring all thoses who refused to show after subpoenas

So much for the rule of law..

So Republicans have gone from
1 didn't happen
2 2nd hand info
3. It happened but they never did the deal so its ok
. 4 they got the money. So again nothing happen

5. Who knows

Was clintons impeachment over turning an election??
Again do you understand the Senate will remove him if convicted
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device