Rep Chris Stewart guts Ambassador Yovanovitch

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you’re right i misspoke. she got an email
from a democrat staffer, and under oath she said she didn’t respond
to it, and she did.

she also admitted zero knowledge of trump doing anything illegal.

she got a standing ovation because trump fired her. that must make her an innocent victim of his scumbaggery, as opposed to it being beyond common for presidents to replace political appointees from the previous administration. democrat presidents NEVER do that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

What part of a witness doesn't determine what is or isn't a crime ..

Why do Republicans keep thinking that has any relevance. If the think it was or was not a crime?

I am certain if she said yes she thought it was a crime .. your tune would be different
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

What part of a witness doesn't determine what is or isn't a crime ..

Why do Republicans keep thinking that has any relevance. If the think it was or was not a crime?

I am certain if she said yes she thought it was a crime .. your tune would be different
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you’re talking gibberish. she was there to play the victim, to say orange man bad because she got fired. but all presidents do that. all of them.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you’re talking gibberish.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I keep telling him this.. he doesn't believe me

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you’re talking gibberish. she was there to play the victim, to say orange man bad because she got fired. but all presidents do that. all of them.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

????????????? What part don't you understand besides all of it
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

????????????? What part don't you understand besides all of it
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

little of what you say. it’s incoherent gibberish.

what did she witness that trump
did, which is a high crime or
misdemeanor? Her getting fired by trump, doesn’t qualify. Sorry.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

little of what you say. it’s incoherent gibberish.

what did she witness that trump
did, which is a high crime or
misdemeanor? Her getting fired by trump, doesn’t qualify. Sorry.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You present the fact she said it was not a crime..

I clearly explained why its not a witness role to determine if a crime was committed..

Clearly you dont understand thats how it is

Then you added your usual she tried to make Trump look bad?

So if she stated Trump committed a crime you whould have went off about her being bias or never trumper or just hateful... correct
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

You present the fact she said it was not a crime..

I clearly explained why its not a witness role to determine if a crime was committed..

Clearly you dont understand thats how it is

Then you added your usual she tried to make Trump look bad?

So if she stated Trump committed a crime you whould have went off about her being bias or never trumper or just hateful... correct
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

nothing she testified to, is evidence he committed a crime. there is evidence, however, that she lied under oath. she made contradictory statements about contact with democrats.

firing her, was not an impeachable offense. even being obnoxious to her, isn’t impeachable.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device