|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
11-16-2019, 10:13 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,496
|
Yea gutted, I guess that’s why she got a standing ovation Jim.
One of the biggest political scandals in American history.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 10:20 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Yea gutted, I guess that’s why she got a standing ovation Jim.
One of the biggest political scandals in American history.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
What was she there to establish? That Trump is mean because he fired her? Presidents don't do that all the time with US attorneys and ambassadors, other appointed positions? In the executive branch, only the president is elected, everyone else comes and goes when administrations change. But it's only mean when Republicans do it. I think Clinton fired all 50 US attoneys (is that right?) and put his own people in.
|
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 10:30 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Trump is mean because he fired her? Presidents don't do that all the time with US attorneys and ambassadors, other appointed positions? In the executive branch, only the president is elected, everyone else comes and goes when administrations change. But it's only mean when Republicans do it. I think Clinton fired all 50 US attoneys (is that right?) and put his own people in.
|
Obama fired every GW Bush appointed ambassador
|
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 11:23 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,496
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
What was she there to establish? That Trump is mean because he fired her? Presidents don't do that all the time with US attorneys and ambassadors, other appointed positions? In the executive branch, only the president is elected, everyone else comes and goes when administrations change. But it's only mean when Republicans do it. I think Clinton fired all 50 US attoneys (is that right?) and put his own people in.
|
That Giuliani was secretly conspiring with Ukrainians running a smear campaign against her to give Trump cover for removal so she couldn't block his corrupt attempts to get investigations into the Bidens and Russian hacking at the expense of US security and solely to help Trump's reelection campaign.
And her testimony was so compelling she got a standing ovation.
That's not a conspiracy theory Jim, it's all laid out as bare as can be in the testimony of highly regarded non-partisan bureaucrats...and there's a lot more to come.
|
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 11:26 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
That Giuliani was secretly conspiring with Ukrainians running a smear campaign against her to give Trump cover for removal so she couldn't block his corrupt attempts to get investigations into the Bidens and Russian hacking at the expense of US security and solely to help Trump's reelection campaign.
And her testimony was so compelling she got a standing ovation. from dummies
That's not a conspiracy theory Jim, it's all laid out as bare as can be in the testimony of highly regarded non-partisan    bureaucrats.
|
work of fiction...nice job though
|
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 11:51 AM
|
#6
|
Ledge Runner Baits
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,688
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
work of fiction...nice job though
|
Question, if as you say this is all fiction, where are those people to state so UNDER oath, none of this happened. No need to answer it is a rhetorical question.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 11:55 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,496
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Stripers
Question, if as you say this is all fiction, where are those people to state so UNDER oath, none of this happened. No need to answer it is a rhetorical question.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Oh you mean those people Trump won't let testify because there's nothing to hide?
|
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 12:10 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Stripers
Question, if as you say this is all fiction, where are those people to state so UNDER oath, none of this happened. No need to answer it is a rhetorical question.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
This is exactly the turning of justice upside down that has been happening ever since the Trump/Russian conspiracy hoax--reversing the accepted presumption of innocence which puts the burden of proof on the demonstration of guilt into requiring the proof of innocence wile presuming guilt.
|
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 11:33 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
That Giuliani was secretly conspiring with Ukrainians running a smear campaign against her to give Trump cover for removal so she couldn't block his corrupt attempts to get investigations into the Bidens and Russian hacking at the expense of US security and solely to help Trump's reelection campaign.
And her testimony was so compelling she got a standing ovation.
That's not a conspiracy theory Jim, it's all laid out as bare as can be in the testimony of highly regarded non-partisan bureaucrats...and there's a lot more to come.
|
"running a smear campaign against her to give Trump cover for removal"
But he doesn't NEED cover for her removal, everyone in the executive branch serves at his pleasure. It's common for new presidents to come in, clean house, and put their own people in. He doesn't need just cause.
She also made mutually exclusive statements about when she first heard about what the Bidens were doing there, one minute she claimed she had no knowledge of Hunter working there until Trump was POTUS, later on she testified that the Obama administration briefed her on what Hunter was doing there. What ese is she wrong or lying about?
"And her testimony was so compelling she got a standing ovation."
Big whoop, your side gives standing ovations to convicted rapist Roman Polanski. Anyone who is a self-perceived victim gets a standing ovation.
You're very impressed by standing ovations I see.
"and there's a lot more to come"
I hope so for your side, there hasn't been anything substantial yet.
|
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 10:32 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Yea gutted, I guess that’s why she got a standing ovation Jim.
One of the biggest political scandals in American history.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
this is a joke
|
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 10:35 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
this is a joke
|
Yup. But he needs it to be seen as a scandal, because he cannot handle the alternative, that he could get re elected. How long will he go into exile if Trump wins again?
|
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 10:46 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
How long will he go into exile if Trump wins again?
|
could be devastating 
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.
|
| |