House to vote on impeachment

[ReelinRod]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

No they don’t
But they should be when they, as these do, consist of bribery, extortion, abuse of power and conspiracy.

And again, a characterization based in feelings that flow from your political agenda, supported by confirmation bias (AKA, a propagandized personal opinion).


Haven't you exhausted yourself furiously masturbating these conspiracy theories only to be denied again and again?

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by ReelinRod

And again, a characterization based in feelings that flow from your political agenda, supported by confirmation bias (AKA, a propagandized personal opinion).


Haven't you exhausted yourself furiously masturbating these conspiracy theories only to be denied again and again?

So when your arguments fail you resort to typical Trumplican nasty verbiage
Impressive
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

So when your arguments fail you resort to typical Trumplican nasty verbiage
Impressive
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

ReelinRod's arguments did not fail. They were very successful.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

ReelinRod's arguments did not fail. They were very successful.

With the choir, are you a bass or tenor?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[ReelinRod]

Originally Posted by wdmso

to use your own words

Haven't you exhausted yourself furiously masturbating these conspiracy theories

Originally Posted by Pete F.

So when your arguments fail you resort to typical Trumplican nasty verbiage
Impressive

I stopped back here just to see what's being discussed. I've been on other boards writing about the Durham investigation and Ukraine and I came here to dabble.

I see a thread (now dead) where you clueless lefties were prattling on for pages, wondering why and what Durham was investigating. I made my first posts substantive, directly answering the question; #69, #71. They were serious, supported posts with actual facts and documentation laying out the very serious criminal acts in the lead-up to the election . . . but that kind of thing is rejected / ignored by the small minds here.

Thereafter, I since pretty much treated you guys as the scat throwing monkeys you are and only resorted to this board for comedic relief from serious discussion I was enjoying elsewhere.

You guys exist in a bubble of idiocy and you delude yourselves, thinking yourselves knowledgeable and witty.

As I said when being accused of "scumminess" for saying the whistleleaker acted in a seditious manner:

"Scumminess" is three pages of the loopyleftie posters here wondering in abject, purposeful, self-imposed ignorance about what Durham is investigating . . . And then, when I exactingly lay out plenty of Obama administration illegality that led directly to the Russian collusion hoax and the fake investigation into it, you ignore it.

Scumminess is ignoring facts you asked for and instead running back under your mommy's apron of another safe, mindless false narrative of the left, only peeking out enough to shake your fist and say orange man bad . . .

So pathetic and so predictable, keep parroting what you think is a cudgel until it is destroyed and then turn and shift to another BS cudgel.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by ReelinRod

I stopped back here just to see what's being discussed. I've been on other boards writing about the Durham investigation and Ukraine and I came here to dabble.

I see a thread (now dead) where you clueless lefties were prattling on for pages, wondering why and what Durham was investigating. I made my first posts substantive, directly answering the question; #69, #71. They were serious, supported posts with actual facts and documentation laying out the very serious criminal acts in the lead-up to the election . . . but that kind of thing is rejected / ignored by the small minds here.

Thereafter, I since pretty much treated you guys as the scat throwing monkeys you are and only resorted to this board for comedic relief from serious discussion I was enjoying elsewhere.

You guys exist in a bubble of idiocy and you delude yourselves, thinking yourselves knowledgeable and witty.

As I said when being accused of "scumminess" for saying the whistleleaker acted in a seditious manner:

"Scumminess" is three pages of the loopyleftie posters here wondering in abject, purposeful, self-imposed ignorance about what Durham is investigating . . . And then, when I exactingly lay out plenty of Obama administration illegality that led directly to the Russian collusion hoax and the fake investigation into it, you ignore it.

Scumminess is ignoring facts you asked for and instead running back under your mommy's apron of another safe, mindless false narrative of the left, only peeking out enough to shake your fist and say orange man bad . . .

So pathetic and so predictable, keep parroting what you think is a cudgel until it is destroyed and then turn and shift to another BS cudgel.

Print that out and save it so you can show Floridaman how you defended him when he goes slithering away.
By the way Paula White said you’re behind in your tithing, you’ll lose your place in Trumptown and you won’t get your share of the koolaid when things don’t work out
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[ReelinRod]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Print that out and save it so you can show Floridaman how you defended him when he goes slithering away.

SMH. Another in a long list of replies from you that show you only write what the voices in your head tell you to. Nothing that I wrote was a defense of Trump; it was all an indictment of you and your comrades here who can not communicate with thinking people.

YOU were wandering in self-imposed ignorance about what Durham was investigating, I provided part of the answer to YOU. You reply with nonsense and then a long stolen screed, copied and pasted without attribution or link. It is your complete ability to discuss let alone debate on display, and your duplicitous tactics and practices of stealing someone else's words and posting them as your own is exhibit one . . .

Originally Posted by Pete F.

By the way Paula White said you’re behind in your tithing, you’ll lose your place in Trumptown and you won’t get your share of the koolaid when things don’t work out

I had to Google Paula White. It is freaking amazing the worthless crap that you know just to throw it out as an insult. An insult that speaks more to your character than any command of pertinent facts. Actual facts you have no time for and remain uninterested in.

Typical leftist.