|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
11-02-2019, 12:32 PM
|
#1
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
I they withheld the aid, what was the trigger that incentivized them to release the aid? Did the investigate Biden?
|
You could try that after you offered a cop a bribe, wouldn’t work in that case either
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
11-02-2019, 02:36 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
You could try that after you offered a cop a bribe, wouldn’t work in that case either
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
No bribe was offered.
|
|
|
|
11-02-2019, 08:36 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
You could try that after you offered a cop a bribe, wouldn’t work in that case either
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
i’m asking a question. if the aid was originally withheld, what made them eventually hand over the aid?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
11-02-2019, 09:51 PM
|
#4
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
i’m asking a question. if the aid was originally withheld, what made them eventually hand over the aid?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Doesn’t matter, crime was already committed.
That’s the reason you have people testifying, even though the WH told them not to
They don’t want to be part of the conspiracy.
Two choices
A. Try and convince the electorate that it’s perfectly acceptable to withhold authorized funds for a personal benefit.
B. Show that you objected to the abuse of power or didn’t know about it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
11-02-2019, 10:17 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Doesn’t matter, crime was already committed.
That’s the reason you have people testifying, even though the WH told them not to
They don’t want to be part of the conspiracy.
Two choices
A. Try and convince the electorate that it’s perfectly acceptable to withhold authorized funds for a personal benefit.
B. Show that you objected to the abuse of power or didn’t know about it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"Doesn’t matter,"
So you don't know either, got it.
"crime was already committed." If threatening to withhold foreign aid unless the recipient does what you want is a crime, explain why Biden didn't commit a crime, for what he bragged about in front of the cameras?
Or was that not the crime you refer to?
|
|
|
|
11-03-2019, 06:17 AM
|
#6
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
"Doesn’t matter,"
So you don't know either, got it.
"crime was already committed." If threatening to withhold foreign aid unless the recipient does what you want is a crime, explain why Biden didn't commit a crime, for what he bragged about in front of the cameras?
Or was that not the crime you refer to?
|
People ranging from former Obama administration officials to an anti-corruption advocate in Ukraine say the official, Viktor Shokin, was ousted for the opposite reason Trump and his allies claim.
It wasn't because Shokin was investigating a natural gas company tied to Biden's son; it was because Shokin wasn't pursuing corruption among the country's politicians, according to a Ukrainian official and four former American officials who specialized in Ukraine and Europe.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
11-03-2019, 07:01 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
People ranging from former Obama administration officials to an anti-corruption advocate in Ukraine say the official, Viktor Shokin, was ousted for the opposite reason Trump and his allies claim.
It wasn't because Shokin was investigating a natural gas company tied to Biden's son; it was because Shokin wasn't pursuing corruption among the country's politicians, according to a Ukrainian official and four former American officials who specialized in Ukraine and Europe.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
lotta people on the Burisma payroll apparently
|
|
|
|
11-03-2019, 08:34 AM
|
#8
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
lotta people on the Burisma payroll apparently
|
🍑🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
11-03-2019, 09:43 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
People ranging from former Obama administration officials to an anti-corruption advocate in Ukraine say the official, Viktor Shokin, was ousted for the opposite reason Trump and his allies claim.
It wasn't because Shokin was investigating a natural gas company tied to Biden's son; it was because Shokin wasn't pursuing corruption among the country's politicians, according to a Ukrainian official and four former American officials who specialized in Ukraine and Europe.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
doesn’t come close to answering the question i asked.
do you need me to repeat it? if withholding aid as leverage to get a foreign power to do what you want, is a crime, how can you deny that biden committed the same crime?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
11-03-2019, 10:34 AM
|
#10
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
doesn’t come close to answering the question i asked.
do you need me to repeat it? if withholding aid as leverage to get a foreign power to do what you want, is a crime, how can you deny that biden committed the same crime?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
What benefit did he receive?
Did he receive assistance from a foreign government in our elections
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 PM.
|
| |