Can you imagine a worse reason to start a civil war?

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I don't think that investigating Biden, when there's that much evidence of corruption, is "interfering" with the election. Knowing more facts about what took place, improves our ability to make an informed vote, it doesn't interfere with it.

Show us the evidence Jim.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Show us the evidence Jim.

hunter got filthy rich at a job he had zero qualifications for, except that his daddy was (1) the VP, (2) the US point person for the same country that employed Hunter ( what a coincidence), and (3) daddy helped fire a prosecutor that might have been looking at this company, (4) it’s reported that john
kerry’s stepson ended his investment partnership with hunter, because he wasn’t comfortable with what hunter was doing in ukraine.

ever heard of circumstantial evidence? sure you have, but only when it applies to republicans.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

hunter got filthy rich at a job he had zero qualifications for, except that his daddy was (1) the VP, (2) the US point person for the same country that employed Hunter ( what a coincidence), and (3) daddy helped fire a prosecutor that might have been looking at this company, (4) it’s reported that john
kerry’s stepson ended his investment partnership with hunter, because he wasn’t comfortable with what hunter was doing in ukraine.

ever heard of circumstantial evidence? sure you have, but only when it applies to republicans.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It's more like a conspiracy theory. I've still never seen a shred of anything that shows Hunter Biden did anything wrong other than poor judgement to take a job that could be seen as a conflict of interest.

And the Biden leverage to fire the prosecutor was bi-partisan and supported by most of Europe. Burisma wasn't even under investigation at the time.

There's no there there.

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by spence

It's more like a conspiracy theory. I've still never seen a shred of anything that shows Hunter Biden did anything wrong other than poor judgement to take a job that could be seen as a conflict of interest.

And the Biden leverage to fire the prosecutor was bi-partisan and supported by most of Europe. Burisma wasn't even under investigation at the time.

There's no there there.

Have you seen a shred of anything that you would consider a reason for hiring Biden. I am guessing you would consider him overqualified...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Have you seen a shred of anything that you would consider a reason for hiring Biden. I am guessing you would consider him overqualified...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Good executive experience, lobbyist, investor, high profile. Burisma at the time was trying to look more like a western firm to distance from their past. One of Biden's former investment partners was hired by the board as well.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

Good executive experience, lobbyist, investor, high profile. Burisma at the time was trying to look more like a western firm to distance from their past. One of Biden's former investment partners was hired by the board as well.

OK. This proves you're just trolling.