What’s Putin’s Puppet hiding?

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

the whistle blower
who didn’t even hear the conversation, but heard someone else describe the conversation?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

How do you know that?

Asking for Fudgie the Whale

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

How do you know that?

Asking for Fudgie the Whale

you can google it. it’s being reported that the whistleblower didn’t hear the call firsthand.

but as we see with kavanaugh, hearsay is sufficient to punish conservatives

trump also said he’s release the transcript of the call.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you can google it. it’s being reported that the whistleblower didn’t hear the call firsthand.

but as we see with kavanaugh, hearsay is sufficient to punish conservatives

trump also said he’s release the transcript of the call.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Reported on Faux, repeated by the Town Hall, Daily Wire, McCarthy, Nunes, Trump and the rest of the chorus.

Odd that the IG, a Trump appointee felt it was credible and urgent.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Reported on Faux, repeated by the Town Hall, Daily Wire, McCarthy, Nunes, Trump and the rest of the chorus.

Odd that the IG, a Trump appointee felt it was credible and urgent.

look at percentage of favorable/unfavorable coverage of obama and trump, for fox and every other American tv station.

fox has a major clown in prime
time, sean hannity. cnn and msnbc have nothing but sean hannity-like ideologues, throughout prime
time.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i’ll ask again for a list of
meaningful policies, for which you disagree with liberals. or admit there aren’t any.

i think conservatives are dead wrong on gay marriage and the death penalty, and i think conservatives are too fanatically opposed to gun control.

you call me a trumplican. show me you’re anywhere near that independent.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you can google it. it’s being reported that the whistleblower didn’t hear the call firsthand.

but as we see with kavanaugh, hearsay is sufficient to punish conservatives

trump also said he’s release the transcript of the call.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Someone with access to sensitive information like that isn't hearsay Jim, there's no way the IG would have deemed the complaint urgent if it wasn't sourced.

I haven't done this in a while but I'm mooting your post.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Someone with access to sensitive information like that isn't hearsay Jim, there's no way the IG would have deemed the complaint urgent if it wasn't sourced.

I haven't done this in a while but I'm mooting your post.

it’s hearsay if the person reporting it, isn’t the one with access to the information. if they are repeating what someone else claims they said or heard, it’s hearsay. like the last kavanaugh accusation. in that case, hearsay was enough for all the major presidential
candidates to demand his impeachment.

let’s have the hearing, one more circus.

any chance you can ever list things you disagree with liberals
on? or at least admit that you wouldn’t dare disagree with obama
on anything, which is why you disappeared here for a month after the election, hiding under your bed s#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&g your thumb.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

it’s hearsay if the person reporting it, isn’t the one with access to the information.

How do you know that? So you think a non-partisan IG is going to forward a potentially impeachable or criminal complaint without being damn sure it's credible? This is stretching reality.

any chance you can ever list things you disagree with liberals
on? or at least admit that you wouldn’t dare disagree with obama
on anything, which is why you disappeared here for a month after the election, hiding under your bed s#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&g your thumb.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It's a silly question as most issues fall on a spectrum. As for your other remark my brain was focused elsewhere for a bit, had nothing to do with the election.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

How do you know that? So you think a non-partisan IG is going to forward a potentially impeachable or criminal complaint without being damn sure it's credible? This is stretching reality.


It's a silly question as most issues fall on a spectrum. As for your other remark my brain was focused elsewhere for a bit, had nothing to do with the election.

i don’t know if it was hearsay, but it’s being reported. that’s why i asked you a question, that’s what that “?” thing at the end of a sentence implies.

it’s not remotely a silly question. it gets at whether or not you have the ability to think for yourself, or if you’re the exact mirror image of sean hannity.

do you think i believe your absence after the election, was a coincidence? give me a little credit.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[RIROCKHOUND]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i don’t know if it was hearsay, but it’s being reported. that’s why i asked you a question, that’s what that “?” thing at the end of a sentence implies.

it’s not remotely a silly question. it gets at whether or not you have the ability to think for yourself, or if you’re the exact mirror image of sean hannity.

do you think i believe your absence after the election, was a coincidence? give me a little credit.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

All I will say about the third point is bitches be crazy......
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by spence

How do you know that? So you think a non-partisan IG is going to forward a potentially impeachable or criminal complaint without being damn sure it's credible? This is stretching reality.


It's a silly question as most issues fall on a spectrum. As for your other remark my brain was focused elsewhere for a bit, had nothing to do with the election.

This is great,the old Jeff is back.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device