| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
06-20-2019, 07:59 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Stripers
Never, but we have never had such a thin skinned reactionary president in office either, so my comfort level is lower then it would be for any other similar situation in the past.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
what evidence is there, to suggest that a more polished, academic, diplomatic president, would get better results with Iran. Carter was a very nice man, right? Iran steamrolled him, humiliated him, made him look like a castrated eunuch.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 10:09 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,501
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
what evidence is there, to suggest that a more polished, academic, diplomatic president, would get better results with Iran.
|
How about the JCPOA. A deal sanctioned by the global community, a deal that Trump's own Jim Mattis praised as having robust enforcement and a deal that the IAEA said was working as planned.
It didn't fix everything but was a solid foundation to address significant issues. Now we're flirting with a conflict that could easily spiral out of control. I do wonder how much SA is really behind most of this.
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 10:20 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
How about the JCPOA. A deal sanctioned by the global community, a deal that Trump's own Jim Mattis praised as having robust enforcement and a deal that the IAEA said was working as planned.
It didn't fix everything but was a solid foundation to address significant issues. Now we're flirting with a conflict that could easily spiral out of control. I do wonder how much SA is really behind most of this.
|
what about that deal ( sincere question) would have incentivized them not to attack the tankers?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 10:28 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,501
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
what about that deal ( sincere question) would have incentivized them not to attack the tankers?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I know of no other deal other than the 12 items of total capitulation demanded by John Bolton via the State Department.
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 12:59 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I know of no other deal other than the 12 items of total capitulation demanded by John Bolton via the State Department.
|
no i said that poorly, i wasn’t referring to another deal. i was asking about the deal you mentioned, i was wondering if that deal would
have put us in a better place right now.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 AM.
|
| |